Keep Factually independent

Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.

Loading...Goal: 1,000 supporters
Loading...

Fact check: What did charlie kirk say about black women stealing white people's jobs?

Checked on September 16, 2025

1. Summary of the results

The original statement inquires about Charlie Kirk's comments regarding Black women stealing white people's jobs. According to the analyses provided, Charlie Kirk made statements that questioned the qualifications and intellectual capabilities of Black women, implying they may have been hired due to affirmative action rather than merit [1]. Specifically, Kirk stated that if he encountered a "moronic Black woman" in customer service, he wondered if she was there due to excellence or affirmative action, which creates "thought patterns that are not necessarily wholesome" and "resentment" [1]. Additionally, Kirk allegedly said that prominent Black women, such as Michelle Obama, were not intelligent or qualified enough to succeed without affirmative action and had to "steal" opportunities from white people [2]. However, not all sources provided direct quotes or information about Charlie Kirk's statements regarding Black women stealing white people's jobs, with some sources being unrelated to the specific claim in question [3] or focusing on the aftermath of Charlie Kirk's death [4] [5] [6] [7].

2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints

A key missing context in the original statement is the lack of direct quotes from Charlie Kirk's statements in some of the analyses [3] [4] [5] [6] [7]. These sources do not provide any information about Charlie Kirk's comments on Black women stealing white people's jobs, instead discussing unrelated topics or the consequences of making insensitive comments about his death. Alternative viewpoints are also missing, as the majority of the analyses focus on Charlie Kirk's alleged statements without providing a balanced perspective on the issue. For instance, the analyses do not mention any potential benefits of affirmative action or the experiences of Black women in the workplace, which could provide a more nuanced understanding of the topic [1] [2]. Furthermore, the sources do not provide any context about Charlie Kirk's overall views on race and gender, which could help to understand the motivations behind his alleged statements [1] [2].

3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement

The original statement may be misleading or biased as it implies that Charlie Kirk made a specific statement about Black women stealing white people's jobs, when in fact, the analyses provide more nuanced and complex information about his alleged comments [1] [2]. The statement may also be sensationalized, as it focuses on a provocative and controversial topic without providing a balanced perspective on the issue. Additionally, the sources may have a bias against Charlie Kirk, as they primarily focus on his alleged statements without providing a more comprehensive understanding of his views or the context in which he made these comments [1] [2]. The beneficiaries of this framing may be those who oppose Charlie Kirk's views or those who want to highlight the issue of racism and sexism in society, as the original statement and the analyses provided may be used to criticize or condemn Charlie Kirk's alleged statements [1] [2].

Want to dive deeper?
What are the statistics on job competition between black women and white people in the US?
How has Charlie Kirk's commentary been received by the black community and social justice advocates?
What role does affirmative action play in job hiring practices according to Charlie Kirk?
Can Charlie Kirk's statements be considered a form of hate speech or racial discrimination?
How do experts respond to Charlie Kirk's claims about job competition and racial disparities in the workforce?