Keep Factually independent

Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.

Loading...Goal: 1,000 supporters
Loading...

Fact check: Did Charlie Kirk actually advocate for stoning gay people?

Checked on September 14, 2025

1. Summary of the results

The claim that Charlie Kirk advocated for stoning gay people is not supported by the majority of the analyses provided [1] [2] [3]. While some sources do mention his opposition to same-sex marriage and criticism of transgender rights [1] [2] [3], as well as his anti-LGBTQ+ rhetoric [1] [2], none of these sources provide evidence that he explicitly advocated for stoning gay people. However, one source suggests that Charlie Kirk may have cited the Bible as the basis for his beliefs, including a reference to Leviticus 20:13, which endorses the execution of homosexuals [4]. Another source implies that Charlie Kirk's views on LGBTQ+ issues may be rooted in his Christian faith, but does not provide direct quotes or evidence of him advocating for stoning gay people [1]. Only one source implies that Charlie Kirk may have advocated for stoning gay people, citing the Bible as the basis for this belief, but it does not provide direct quotes from Kirk [5].

2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints

A key piece of missing context is direct quotes or evidence from Charlie Kirk himself regarding his views on stoning gay people [1] [2] [3]. The sources provided primarily focus on his opposition to same-sex marriage and transgender rights, as well as his anti-LGBTQ+ rhetoric, without explicitly addressing the claim in question. Alternative viewpoints, such as those from LGBTQ+ advocacy groups, may provide additional context on the potential harm caused by Charlie Kirk's rhetoric, but these perspectives are not fully represented in the provided analyses [2]. It is also important to consider the potential impact of Charlie Kirk's words on the LGBTQ+ community, as well as the role of Christian faith in shaping his views on LGBTQ+ issues [1] [4].

3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement

The original statement may be misleading or exaggerated, as the majority of the analyses provided do not support the claim that Charlie Kirk advocated for stoning gay people [1] [2] [3]. The sources that do imply Charlie Kirk may have held such views are limited and lack direct evidence [5] [4]. It is possible that the original statement is biased against Charlie Kirk, as it presents a claim that is not supported by the majority of the analyses provided. LGBTQ+ advocacy groups and individuals who oppose Charlie Kirk's views may benefit from this framing, as it reinforces their criticism of his anti-LGBTQ+ rhetoric and opposition to same-sex marriage and transgender rights [2]. On the other hand, Charlie Kirk and his supporters may be harmed by this framing, as it presents a claim that is not supported by the majority of the analyses provided and may be seen as an attempt to discredit him [1].

Want to dive deeper?
What are Charlie Kirk's views on LGBTQ+ rights?
Has Charlie Kirk ever apologized for his comments on gay people?
How does Turning Point USA address LGBTQ+ issues under Charlie Kirk's leadership?
What was the public reaction to Charlie Kirk's alleged advocacy for stoning gay people?
Does Charlie Kirk's stance on gay people reflect the broader conservative movement's views?