Fact check: Did Charlie Kirk say gays should be stoned to death?

1. Summary of the results

The analyses provided do not support the claim that Charlie Kirk said gays should be stoned to death ^{[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7]}. While some sources mention his opposition to same-sex marriage and gender care for transgender people, citing his Christian faith ^[1], and his criticism of gay and transgender rights ^[2], none of the sources directly quote him as saying gays should be stoned to death. However, one source mentions that Kirk referenced a Bible passage about stoning in response to someone else's video, but not as a direct call for action against gay people ^[6]. Another source suggests that Kirk held anti-LGBTQ+ views, citing the Bible verse Leviticus 20:13, which endorses the execution of homosexuals, but does not explicitly state he said gays should be stoned to death ^[7].

2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints

Some key context missing from the original statement includes the specific circumstances under which Charlie Kirk discussed or referenced the Bible passage about stoning ^[6]. Additionally, the original statement lacks nuance in understanding Charlie Kirk's views on LGBTQ+ issues, as he has been reported to have encouraged students to report professors suspected of embracing 'gender ideology' ^[2], and has been criticized for his anti-LGBTQ+ rhetoric ^[3]. Alternative viewpoints on Charlie Kirk's legacy and his impact on the LGBTQ+ community are also essential to consider, as some sources highlight his polarizing stance on gay and transgender rights ^[1], while others condemn his rhetoric as potentially fueling harassment and violence against queer and transgender people ^[3].

3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement

The original statement may be an example of misinformation or exaggeration, as none of the provided sources support the claim that Charlie Kirk said gays should be stoned to death ^{[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7]}. This framing may benefit those who seek to further polarize public opinion on Charlie Kirk and his views, or those who aim to distract from more nuanced discussions about his actual statements and actions on LGBTQ+ issues. It is essential to approach such claims with a critical eye, considering multiple sources and evaluating the potential for bias or misinformation, as some sources may have a vested interest in portraying Charlie Kirk in a particular light ^{[3] [7]}.