Keep Factually independent

Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.

Loading...Goal: 1,000 supporters
Loading...

Fact check: What was the context of Charlie Kirk's alleged 'gays should be shot' statement?

Checked on September 12, 2025

1. Summary of the results

The original statement regarding Charlie Kirk's alleged 'gays should be shot' statement has been analyzed through various sources. Initially, sources such as [1], [2], and [3] do not mention the specific statement but discuss Charlie Kirk's assassination, the investigation, and his past statements on marginalized groups [1] [2] [3]. Similarly, sources [4], [5], and [6] also do not mention the statement but focus on his polarizing stance on gay and transgender rights, the updates on the shooting incident, and condemnation of his anti-LGBTQ+ rhetoric [4] [5] [6]. However, sources [7] and [8] provide context where Charlie Kirk is quoted citing the Bible verse Leviticus 20:13, which calls for the death of homosexuals, framing it as "God's perfect law" and implying that homosexuality warrants capital punishment [7] [8]. This suggests that while the exact phrase 'gays should be shot' is not directly attributed to Charlie Kirk in most sources, his anti-LGBTQ+ rhetoric and citation of biblical verses to justify capital punishment for homosexuality are documented.

2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints

A key missing context in the original statement is the distinction between Charlie Kirk's alleged statement and his documented anti-LGBTQ+ rhetoric. Sources like [4] and [6] highlight his opposition to same-sex marriage and gender care for transgender people, and his use of biblical verses to justify capital punishment for homosexuality [4] [7] [8]. Alternative viewpoints come from sources that condemn his rhetoric while also denouncing political violence and gun violence, such as [6]. It's crucial to consider the broader context of political polarization, gun violence, and the impact of rhetoric on marginalized communities. The sources also underscore the complexity of responding to Charlie Kirk's assassination, emphasizing the need to address the root causes of violence and polarization [3] [6].

3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement

The original statement may contain potential misinformation or bias by attributing a specific and extreme statement ('gays should be shot') to Charlie Kirk without clear evidence from most sources [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6]. However, sources [7] and [8] do provide evidence of his endorsement of biblical verses that call for the death of homosexuals, which could be interpreted as endorsing capital punishment for gay people. This framing could benefit those seeking to highlight the extreme nature of anti-LGBTQ+ rhetoric, but it also risks oversimplifying complex issues and ignoring the nuances of political discourse. On the other hand, sources that focus on his polarizing legacy and the need to consider the broader context of gun violence and political polarization may benefit from a more nuanced approach to discussing Charlie Kirk's statements and their impact [3] [4] [6].

Want to dive deeper?
What was Charlie Kirk's response to backlash over his alleged statement?
Has Charlie Kirk faced any consequences for his comments on LGBTQ+ issues?
What organizations have criticized Charlie Kirk for his alleged 'gays should be shot' statement?
How has Charlie Kirk's statement affected his relationship with conservative groups?
Are there any recordings or transcripts of Charlie Kirk's alleged statement?