Keep Factually independent

Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.

Loading...Goal: 1,000 supporters
Loading...

Fact check: Did charlie kirk say george floyd deserved to be killed because he was a junkie?

Checked on September 14, 2025

1. Summary of the results

The original statement claims that Charlie Kirk said George Floyd deserved to be killed because he was a junkie. However, upon reviewing the analyses provided, there is no direct evidence to support this claim [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8]. While some sources report that Charlie Kirk referred to George Floyd as a 'scumbag' [2] [8], none of the sources provide a direct quote of Charlie Kirk saying George Floyd deserved to be killed because he was a junkie. The analyses suggest that Charlie Kirk's views on George Floyd are controversial, but the specific statement in question is not supported by the available evidence [1] [6].

2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints

Some sources provide context about Charlie Kirk's views on various topics, including George Floyd, but do not specify what those views are [1]. Other sources report on Charlie Kirk's death and his controversial statements on various issues, but do not mention the specific statement in question [6] [7]. Additionally, some sources appear to be unrelated to the topic [4] [5], or do not provide relevant information [3]. Alternative viewpoints on Charlie Kirk's legacy and influence are also presented, with some sources highlighting his role in building support for Trump among young people [8], while others criticize his views as contemptuous and supremacist [2]. The lack of direct evidence and the presence of conflicting viewpoints highlight the need for further investigation and consideration of multiple sources [1] [2] [6] [7] [8].

3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement

The original statement may be misleading or inaccurate due to the lack of direct evidence to support the claim [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8]. Charlie Kirk's critics may benefit from this framing, as it reinforces their negative perception of his views and legacy [2]. On the other hand, Charlie Kirk's supporters may be harmed by this framing, as it perpetuates a negative and potentially inaccurate narrative about his statements and beliefs [8]. The media and the public must be cautious when reporting and sharing information, ensuring that they rely on credible sources and avoid spreading misinformation or biased narratives [1] [6].

Want to dive deeper?
What was Charlie Kirk's exact statement about George Floyd's death?
How did Black Lives Matter respond to Charlie Kirk's comments on George Floyd?
Has Charlie Kirk apologized for his statements about George Floyd?
What is Charlie Kirk's stance on police brutality and systemic racism?
How have conservative media outlets covered Charlie Kirk's comments on George Floyd?