What context or event prompted Charlie Kirk's comment about gun deaths and the Second Amendment?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
Charlie Kirk made the remark that “it’s worth to have a cost of, unfortunately, some gun deaths every single year so that we can have the Second Amendment” while defending an armed citizenry as the price of liberty at a Turning Point USA event in December 2023, a comment that resurfaced and drew wide attention after he was shot at a Utah event in September 2025 [1] [2]. Reporting and fact-checking trace the line of attribution to a Turning Point conference appearance and note how the quote was used by critics and supporters after his assassination [1] [3].
1. Where and when Kirk said it — the immediate source
The comment was made publicly in late 2023 during a Turning Point-organized event, commonly identified in reporting as America Fest in December 2023, where Kirk argued the Second Amendment exists to guard against tyranny and that an armed citizenry “comes with a price” that includes some gun deaths [1]. Newsweek and FactCheck cited the same timeframe and attributed the remark to his remarks at a Turning Point gathering in 2023 [2] [1].
2. What Kirk was arguing at the time — the rhetorical frame
Kirk framed the statement as part of a broader defense of the Second Amendment: he said the amendment is “there, God forbid, so that you can defend yourself against a tyrannical government,” and that “having an armed citizenry comes with a price,” meaning society will not be free of gun deaths if citizens remain armed [1]. Newsweek summarized this as Kirk saying “gun deaths in exchange for the preservation of Second Amendment rights is part of America’s reality” [2].
3. How the quote resurfaced and why it became salient in 2025
After Kirk was shot at an event at Utah Valley University on Sept. 10, 2025, reporters, social posts and commentators re-circulated the 2023 remark as a way to contextualize or criticize his prior stance on guns; outlets including Reuters, The Guardian and entertainment sites noted the quote resurfaced in the immediate aftermath of the shooting [3] [4] [5]. FactCheck.org and others documented that the quote was widely shared and verified its origin at a Turning Point event [1].
4. Competing reactions — condemnation, critique, and defense
Critics used the quote to argue Kirk had normalized acceptable levels of gun deaths and to condemn his rhetorical calculus; gun-safety advocates, including Giffords, linked the assassination to the broader policy debate on firearms and urged stricter laws [6] [2]. Some commentators, including conservative allies, rejected framing his murder as a policy outcome and defended his right to free speech; Erika Kirk publicly pushed back against claims that gun violence was the root problem behind his assassination, according to Fox News reporting [7].
5. How fact-checkers and reporting contextualized the line
FactCheck.org examined viral posts and found that Kirk’s remarks were made in the context of defending the amendment and acknowledging tradeoffs, quoting him saying “you will never live in a society when you have an armed citizenry and you won’t have a single gun death” and that the cost of an armed populace is some deaths — language traced to his December 2023 appearance [1]. Newsweek and other outlets corrected and clarified headlines to add context to the remarks when republishing them after 2025 events [2] [1].
6. Why context matters — policy, optics, and political weaponization
The quote’s resurfacing after a real-world shooting made it a political and moral touchstone: opponents argued it revealed a willingness to tolerate preventable deaths for policy ends, while allies said the comment was a theoretical acknowledgment of tradeoffs in liberty versus risk. Reuters documented how the line was used in social media and disciplinary campaigns after Kirk’s assassination to target critics and supporters alike, showing how such remarks can be weaponized in polarized moments [3].
7. Limits of current reporting and unresolved threads
Available sources do not mention any primary transcript or full unedited video that captures the exact surrounding sentences beyond the excerpts cited by Newsweek and FactCheck, though those outlets and multiple news reports place the comment at Turning Point’s 2023 event [1] [2]. Reporting documents reactions and subsequent political fallout but does not settle normative questions about causation between rhetoric and violence; that link remains a matter of debate among commentators [3] [6].
Bottom line: the remark originated in a December 2023 Turning Point event as part of Kirk’s argument that the Second Amendment’s protections entail tradeoffs, and it returned to public view and became politically charged after Kirk was shot in September 2025, prompting intense cross-ideological scrutiny and fact-checking [1] [3] [2].