What did Charlie Kirk say about Kamala Harris and when was it reported?

1. Disturbing Personal Attacks That Were Widely Reported

Charlie Kirk repeatedly delivered personal attacks on Kamala Harris, including calling her “deeply scary,” mispronouncing her name, labeling her “unlikable” and “radical,” and asserting she has “very, very low IQ.” These comments were reported as aired on his show on July 22, 2024, and were documented by media watchdog coverage the same day ^[1]. The same period produced a follow-up claim that Harris has “unaddressed lingering father issues,” a psychological interpretation Kirk voiced and which was recorded on August 30, 2024. These pieces emphasize Kirk’s approach of combining ad hominem characterizations with speculative psychology as a rhetorical strategy when discussing Harris ^[5].

2. Claims About Harris Encouraging Women to Lie — Reported During 2024 Campaign Coverage

Kirk asserted that Kamala Harris’s campaign encouraged women to lie to their husbands about voting for her, criticizing an ad he interpreted as advising secrecy to avoid marital strife. That critique was reported on October 30, 2024, and originated from Kirk’s remarks on Megyn Kelly’s podcast where he framed the ad as “repulsive” and a threat to family norms. Alternative interpretations at the time argued the ad could be seen as protecting women in coercive marriages who need a secret ballot to safely exercise voting rights; the reporting captures both Kirk’s denunciation and the counterargument that his reading overlooked the safety rationale behind secret ballots ^[6].

3. Policy-Based Alarms: ‘Kidnap’ Charge and ‘Fertility Collapse’ Rhetoric

Kirk advanced policy-oriented alarms accusing Harris of supporting a nationalization of policies that would allow children to be hidden from parents under transgender protections, framing this as an attempt to “kidnap” children. This claim was made on The Charlie Kirk Show and reported July 29, 2024, tied to California law debates about schools notifying parents of students’ gender-identification changes; proponents argued the law protects vulnerable LGBTQ+ students ^[2]. Separately, Kirk discussed a so-called “fertility collapse” and linked young women voting patterns and priorities to declining birth rates in a September 2025 recounting of his remarks, which portrayed women as prioritizing careerism and consumerism over family — a framing that drew scrutiny for generalization and provocation ^[4].

4. Accusations About Diversity Selection and Immigration — Broader Narrative Themes

Kirk also characterized Harris as a “DEI candidate,” asserting she was chosen in 2020 primarily because she is a Black woman, a remark reported in a September 11, 2025 profile examining his influence on conservatism ^[3]. In addition, Kirk repeatedly pushed false or exaggerated claims tying Harris personally to responsibility for undocumented immigration, a pattern noted in later analyses published the same September 2025 period. These assertions align with broader conservative culture-war themes Kirk has used to mobilize supporters by framing Harris and Democrats as emblematic of policies he portrays as antithetical to conservative values ^{[7] [3]}.

5. How the Reporting Framed These Statements and the Counterpoints Presented

Contemporaneous reporting captured both the provocative nature of Kirk’s rhetoric and the pushback: watchdog outlets documented the remarks and, in some pieces, provided context showing mischaracterizations (for example, the secret-ballot ad’s protective rationale) or flagged factual exaggeration (claims that Harris “seeks to kidnap” children). Coverage from July through October 2024 presented the remarks as part of Kirk’s standard strategy of amplification on podcasts and his show, while September 2025 retrospectives placed these episodes within his larger role shaping young conservatives and the culture-war agenda ^{[6] [2] [3] [7]}.

6. Bottom Line — What He Said, When It Appeared, and What That Means for Verification

In short, Charlie Kirk’s statements about Kamala Harris spanned personal insults, policy alarms, and identity-based critiques, with documented reports appearing between July 2024 and September 2025. Key dated reports include July 22 and 29, 2024 (personal and policy claims), August 30 and October 22–30, 2024 (psychological and religious-value critiques), and September 10–11, 2025 (retrospective compilation and influence pieces) ^{[1] [2] [5] [6] [4] [3]}. These items show a consistent pattern: Kirk uses charged, sometimes factually contested rhetoric to make broader political points, and verification requires checking each claim against primary statements, campaign materials, and the underlying laws or ads he references ^{[2] [6] [7]}.