Did Charlie Kirk actually say gay people should be stoned to death?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Was this fact-check helpful?
1. Summary of the results
The claim that Charlie Kirk said gay people should be stoned to death is not supported by the majority of the analyses provided [1] [2] [3]. While none of the sources directly quote Charlie Kirk saying gay people should be stoned to death [1], some sources mention that he cited the Bible verse Leviticus 20:13, which endorses the execution of homosexuals, as 'God's perfect law when it comes to sexual matters' [2] [1]. One source mentions a scholar, Nicole Hemmer, saying that Charlie Kirk has said it's probably the right call for gay people to be stoned, but this statement is not directly quoted from Charlie Kirk himself [4]. The analyses also highlight Charlie Kirk's opposition to same-sex marriage and his belief in traditional values [2] [3].
2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints
A key piece of missing context is the direct quote from Charlie Kirk himself regarding the issue of stoning gay people, which is not provided in any of the analyses [1]. Alternative viewpoints, such as the impact of Charlie Kirk's statements on the LGBT+ community, are also not fully explored in the analyses [2]. Additionally, the historical and cultural context of the Bible verse Leviticus 20:13 is not thoroughly examined in the analyses, which could provide a more nuanced understanding of Charlie Kirk's statements [2] [1]. The role of Charlie Kirk's political legacy and his appeal to young conservatives is also mentioned in some analyses, but could be further explored [1] [3].
3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement
The original statement may be misleading or exaggerated, as none of the sources directly quote Charlie Kirk saying gay people should be stoned to death [1]. This framing may benefit critics of Charlie Kirk who seek to highlight his controversial views on the LGBT+ community [2]. On the other hand, supporters of Charlie Kirk may argue that his statements are being taken out of context or that he is being unfairly maligned [1] [3]. The media outlets and scholars cited in the analyses may also have their own biases or agendas, which could influence the presentation of the information [2] [1]. Ultimately, a more nuanced and balanced understanding of Charlie Kirk's views and their impact on the LGBT+ community is needed to fully assess the original statement [4].