Fact check: What were Charlie Kirk's exact comments about Michelle Obama?

1. Summary of the results

The analyses provided from various sources ^{[1] [2] [3]} all agree that Charlie Kirk made comments about Michelle Obama, suggesting that she and other prominent Black women, including Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, MSNBC host Joy Reid, and the late Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee, lack the brain processing power to be taken seriously and that they had to "steal a white person's slot" to be taken somewhat seriously ^{[1] [2] [3]}. These comments were met with disagreement from Barack Obama, who emphasized the importance of respecting others' right to express their opinions, even if they are disagreed with, and that condemning violence does not mean abandoning debate about harmful beliefs ^{[1] [2] [3]}.

2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints

A key point missing from the original statement is the context in which Charlie Kirk made these comments, as none of the analyses provided specify the exact circumstances or event at which these comments were made ^{[1] [2] [3]}. Additionally, the analyses do not provide alternative viewpoints from other individuals or groups who may have been affected by or have opinions on Charlie Kirk's comments, which could offer a more comprehensive understanding of the situation ^{[1] [2] [3]}. It is also worth noting that the sources ^{[1] [2] [3]} all seem to be reporting on the same event and comments, with no divergent opinions or analyses presented, which could indicate a lack of diversity in the sources consulted.

3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement

The original statement asks for Charlie Kirk's exact comments about Michelle Obama, but does not provide any context about the comments or the situation in which they were made ^{[1] [2] [3]}. This lack of context could potentially lead to misinformation or misinterpretation of Charlie Kirk's comments, as the reader is not provided with a full understanding of the situation. Furthermore, the fact that all the analyses provided seem to be reporting on the same event and comments, with no divergent opinions or analyses presented, could indicate bias in the sources consulted ^{[1] [2] [3]}. The sources ^{[1] [2] [3]} all seem to be framing the situation in a similar way, which could benefit those who wish to emphasize the controversy surrounding Charlie Kirk's comments, but may not provide a balanced view of the situation.