Did Charlie Kirk say that Martin L King was awful
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Was this fact-check helpful?
1. Summary of the results
The statement in question is whether Charlie Kirk said that Martin L King was awful. According to multiple sources, including [1], [2], [1], and [2], Charlie Kirk did indeed call Martin Luther King Jr. 'awful', stating 'MLK was awful. He's not a good person. He said one good thing he actually didn't believe' [1] [2]. These sources verify the quote and provide evidence, including an audio recording from America Fest in December 2023 [2]. However, not all sources confirm this statement, with some sources, such as [3] and [3], not providing any relevant information to confirm or deny the statement [3]. Additionally, sources [4], [5], and [6] do not mention Charlie Kirk saying Martin L King was awful, instead reporting on the condemnation of Charlie Kirk's beliefs and actions by various organizations and individuals [4] [5] [6].
2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints
A key piece of missing context is the motivation behind Charlie Kirk's statement, which is not explicitly stated in the sources [1] [2]. Some sources suggest that Charlie Kirk and TPUSA are attempting to discredit Martin Luther King Jr. and the Civil Rights Act [1]. Alternative viewpoints are also present, with the Congressional Black Caucus strongly disagreeing with many of Charlie Kirk's beliefs [4], and a coalition of civil rights organizations condemning a House resolution glorifying Charlie Kirk's record [6]. Furthermore, Bernice King, Martin Luther King Jr.'s daughter, has slammed a tribute comparing Charlie Kirk to her father [3]. These alternative viewpoints highlight the controversy and disagreement surrounding Charlie Kirk's statement [3] [4] [6].
3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement
The original statement may be misleading or biased, as it does not provide context for Charlie Kirk's statement or acknowledge the controversy and disagreement surrounding it [1] [2]. The sources that verify the quote do not necessarily endorse or agree with Charlie Kirk's statement, but rather present it as a fact [1] [2]. On the other hand, sources that do not mention the statement or provide alternative viewpoints may be omitting relevant information or presenting a biased perspective [3] [4] [5] [6]. Ultimately, the original statement benefits from a critical evaluation of the sources and their potential biases, as well as consideration of the broader context and controversy surrounding Charlie Kirk's statement [1] [3] [2] [4] [5] [6].