Did Charlie Kirk said Martin Luther king jr was awful?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Was this fact-check helpful?
1. Summary of the results
Yes, Charlie Kirk did call Martin Luther King Jr. "awful." Multiple sources confirm that Kirk made these statements at America Fest in December 2023. The exact quote, as verified by several analyses, was: "MLK was awful. He's not a good person. He said one good thing he actually didn't believe" [1] [2]. This quote was initially reported by journalist William Turton in a January 2024 article for Wired, who provided an audio recording of Kirk's speech [3] [2].
The verification of this quote gained additional credibility when Snopes confirmed its authenticity after the journalist provided the audio recording [3]. This represents a significant shift in Kirk's public position on MLK, as one source notes that Kirk had previously called King a "hero" in 2015 before adopting this more critical stance by 2023 [1].
Beyond the "awful" comment, Kirk has also expressed broader criticism of the civil rights movement. He has stated that "we made a huge mistake when we passed the Civil Rights Act in the 1960s" and believes the Civil Rights Act of 1964 was a "huge mistake" [4] [5]. These statements demonstrate a comprehensive rejection of key civil rights achievements associated with King's legacy.
The controversy surrounding these statements intensified following Kirk's death, when some attempted to draw comparisons between Kirk and MLK. Black church leaders and civil rights advocates have strongly rejected these comparisons, with some describing Kirk as an "unapologetic racist" [6]. Congressman Carter has also issued statements criticizing Kirk's positions on civil rights legislation [7].
2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints
The original question lacks several important contextual elements that provide a fuller picture of this controversy. First, the timing and venue of Kirk's statements are crucial - these comments were made at America Fest in December 2023, a conservative political gathering, which suggests they were delivered to a sympathetic audience rather than in a neutral forum [2] [1].
The question also omits Kirk's evolution on this topic over time. One source reveals that Kirk's position on MLK has shifted dramatically, from calling him a "hero" in 2015 to describing him as "awful" in 2023 [1]. This timeline suggests a deliberate ideological transformation rather than a consistent long-held belief.
Additionally, the question doesn't capture the broader pattern of Kirk's civil rights criticism. His comments about MLK are part of a larger critique that includes calling the Civil Rights Act a "mistake" [4] [5]. This context shows that Kirk's criticism extends beyond personal attacks on King to fundamental opposition to civil rights legislation.
The response from the Black community and civil rights leaders is also missing from the original question. Multiple sources indicate strong pushback from Black church leaders, clergy, and political figures who have rejected attempts to compare Kirk to MLK and have criticized his rhetoric [6] [7] [8].
3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement
The original question itself appears relatively neutral and factual, simply asking whether Kirk made these statements. However, there are subtle elements that could reflect bias or incomplete framing.
The question's simplicity might minimize the broader context and implications of Kirk's statements. By focusing solely on whether he called MLK "awful," it potentially overlooks the systematic nature of Kirk's criticism of the civil rights movement and the inflammatory context in which these statements were made.
Additionally, the question doesn't acknowledge the verification process that was necessary to confirm these quotes. The fact that a journalist had to provide audio recordings and that Snopes was involved in verification suggests these weren't widely publicized statements initially, which adds important context about their discovery and confirmation [3].
The framing also doesn't capture the political motivations that might be behind both Kirk's statements and the subsequent controversy. Sources suggest this is part of a broader effort to "discredit Martin Luther King Jr. and the Civil Rights Act," indicating organized political strategy rather than isolated comments [1].