When and where did Charlie Kirk make the public executions comment and who organized the event?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
Charlie Kirk made comments endorsing public executions and even suggesting children could watch during a 2024 episode of his podcast “ThoughtCrime,” a discussion that resurfaced and drew heavy attention after his September 10, 2025, killing at Utah Valley University (reported as a public, on-campus shooting) [1] [2]. Contemporary reporting and fact-checking show Kirk discussed the death penalty and argued public access could deter crime; some outlets summarized his remarks as saying children should watch, while Snopes details that the viral phrasing was an inaccurate condensation of the original exchange [1] [3].
1. Where and when the comments were made — a podcast exchange, not a public rally
Kirk’s statements came during a 2024 episode of The Charlie Kirk Show’s panel segment “ThoughtCrime,” where he and a guest discussed capital punishment and public executions; the exchange included him saying executions are “heavy,” that making them public could deter crime, and that exposing young people could serve as an “initiation” — lines later condensed by some outlets into the claim that he said “children should watch public executions” [1] [3].
2. How reporting compressed the original language — fact‑checkers push back
Snopes’ analysis finds that Kirk did acknowledge public executions and the death penalty were “heavy” topics and argued for public access as a deterrent, but the most inflammatory phrasing circulating in 2025 (“children should watch public executions”) appears to be an imprecise summary rather than a verbatim quotation; Snopes says the viral claim “appeared to be an incorrectly attributed summary of the THOUGHTCRIME discussion” [1]. Newsweek and other outlets reported the more direct framing that Kirk suggested children should watch, quoting parts of the exchange where he discussed age and the “holy” gravity of the act [3].
3. Why the remarks matter now — context of the September 2025 killing
The resurfacing and amplification of Kirk’s 2024 remarks occurred after he was shot and killed while speaking at Utah Valley University on September 10, 2025, an on-campus event described in multiple reports as part of his “American Comeback Tour”; that violent public attack intensified scrutiny of his past rhetoric on punishment and public spectacle [2]. Reporting about the murder and ensuing legal proceedings has referenced the earlier podcast discussion as relevant to debates about rhetoric, political violence and capital punishment [4] [5].
4. Who organized the event where he was killed — a university speaking engagement
Kirk was shot while speaking at Utah Valley University in Orem, Utah, at an event tied to his speaking tour; media coverage and commentary identify the campus engagement as the setting for the assassination, though the specific promoter or ticketing host beyond the university context is not detailed in the sources provided [2]. Available sources do not mention the private promoter or ticket vendor that organized or sold access to that particular appearance [2].
5. Competing framings in the sources — deterrence argument vs. outrage over spectacle
One line of reporting and Kirk’s own words frame public executions as a potential deterrent and civic “initiation,” a position described in the podcast exchange itself and reiterated by outlets quoting him [3]. Fact‑checkers like Snopes caution that the most inflammatory paraphrase circulating after his death misstates or overstates the precise wording used on the show [1]. This produces two competing public narratives: critics and shocked observers treat the paraphrase as emblematic of a callous embrace of state violence, while others point to the original audio’s nuance and the possibility that headlines distorted the remark [1] [3].
6. What’s reliably sourced and what isn’t — limitations in reporting
The reliable facts in the sources are: Kirk discussed public executions and the death penalty on a 2024 “ThoughtCrime” episode and said public viewing could deter crime; his comments were widely reported and later summarized in social media and news coverage [1] [3]. The sensational paraphrase that “he said children should watch public executions” is attributed in some news stories but flagged by Snopes as an imprecise condensation of the conversation [1]. Available sources do not mention a verbatim transcript that definitively settles every disputed phrase, and they do not identify the private organizer of the Utah Valley University appearance beyond its being a campus speaking event [1] [2].
7. Why this distinction matters — rhetoric, responsibility and the public record
Sorting exact phrasing from summarizing headlines matters because the difference—between arguing for public executions as policy and saying minors should be forced to watch them—shapes legal, ethical and political responses. Fact‑checking (Snopes) and contemporaneous news accounts (Newsweek, Hindustan Times, The Hill, ABC) provide competing emphases: one presses accuracy around the quote, the others highlight the moral shock and policy implications of his views as reported [1] [3] [6] [7]. Journalists and readers should treat both the original audio and subsequent summaries as relevant evidence and note when reporting relies on paraphrase rather than verbatim citation [1].
If you want, I can extract the exact timestamps and fuller transcript quotes from the 2024 podcast episode cited by Snopes and Newsweek — the sources reference a 51:17 mark discussed by fact‑checkers — but the present reporting already indicates disagreement about how to characterize Kirk’s words [1] [3].