What specific remarks did Charlie Kirk make about Martin Luther King Jr. and in what context?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
Charlie Kirk told an audience at Turning Point USA’s AmericaFest in December 2023 that “MLK was awful. He’s not a good person,” and that King is admired only because he “said one thing he didn’t actually believe,” remarks first reported by Wired and independently corroborated by outlets including Snopes and FactCheck.org [1] [2] [3]. Those comments were reported as made off the main stage in a smaller conference room at the AmericaFest event, and recordings posted of the main stage do not contain the lines quoted in subsequent reporting [1] [3].
1. What Kirk said and when — a blunt reversal at AmericaFest
Reporting by Wired says the comments occurred in December 2023 at AmericaFest, a Turning Point USA convention; Wired quotes Kirk calling Martin Luther King Jr. “awful” and “not a good person,” arguing that King is only admired because he “said one thing he didn’t actually believe” — a line Wired frames as part of a broader effort to discredit King and the Civil Rights Act of 1964 [1]. Snopes independently verified the quote and the provenance of the Wired reporting, saying journalist William Turton’s recording backed the statement [2].
2. Location and availability of recordings — onstage vs. offstage
FactCheck.org notes that those explicit remarks do not appear in the YouTube recordings of the conference’s main stage; the Wired reporter later confirmed to FactCheck that he witnessed the comments in a smaller conference room, not on the event’s primary stage [3]. That distinction matters to verification: multiple outlets rely on journalist reporting and an off-stage audio pass rather than widely distributed stage video [3] [1].
3. Historical context — Kirk’s earlier praise and why the change matters
Before December 2023, Wired and other reporting document that Kirk had previously praised King, calling him a “hero” and a “civil rights icon,” making this a public reversal rather than a long-held line [4] [1]. Wired interprets the December remarks as part of a strategic campaign to undermine both King’s legacy and the Civil Rights Act, connecting the comments to broader conservative messaging about race and law [1].
4. Corroboration and fact-checking — multiple outlets, different emphases
Snopes says it had access to an audio recording provided by the Wired reporter that verified the quote [2]. FactCheck.org warns that the most-viewed conference recordings don’t carry the comment and highlights that the reporter confirmed the remarks occurred off the main stage [3]. Newsweek, CBC and several newspapers subsequently summarized the same core claim and framed it as a notable flip by Kirk [5] [6] [7].
5. How outlets interpret motive and strategy — beyond a single sentence
Wired situates the remarks within a deliberate effort by Kirk and Turning Point USA to delegitimize the Civil Rights Act and recast modern civil-rights-era leaders as problematic, suggesting the comments were tactic rather than a spontaneous insult [1]. Other outlets present the remarks as a provocative rhetorical reversal that sparked backlash; the reporting shows consensus that the comments were intended to reorient conservative narratives about race and legal history [5] [6].
6. Limits of the available reporting — what we do and do not know
Available sources confirm the quote and its origin in Wired reporting and a recording shared with fact-checkers, and they note the remarks were off the main stage [1] [2] [3]. Sources do not supply a verbatim full transcript of the off-stage remarks in the public main-stage videos, nor do they publish the complete audio file in widely available outlets cited here; therefore the precise surrounding exchange and full context beyond the quoted lines are not fully reproduced in the cited reporting [3] [1].
7. Competing perspectives and the broader fallout
Some outlets frame Kirk’s words as part of a deliberate political strategy to undermine civil-rights gains (Wired), while fact-checkers emphasize the need for caution because the comments were off the main stage and not in widely circulated video [1] [3]. After Kirk’s later high-profile death and continued coverage, many outlets summarized the December 2023 remarks as emblematic of his provocations and ideological stances, citing the original reporting and fact checks [8] [9].
Summary recommendation for readers: The best-documented public account is Wired’s reporting, corroborated by Snopes and clarified by FactCheck.org about where the remarks occurred; read those pieces directly for the reporter’s sourcing and the partial audio verification referenced by fact-checkers [1] [2] [3].