Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
How did Charlie Kirk respond to criticism of his comments on Black women Supreme Court nominees?
Executive summary
Charlie Kirk criticized Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson and other prominent Black women as “affirmative action” beneficiaries and said they “do not have the brain processing power to be taken really seriously” in a July 2023 podcast segment, a line verified by fact-checkers (see Snopes and Lead Stories) [1] [2]. Coverage later showed that some outlets and social posts broadened his words into a general statement about “Black women,” prompting corrections and clarifications in major outlets [3] [4].
1. What Kirk actually said — the narrow quote and context
On a July 13–14, 2023 episode of The Charlie Kirk Show, Kirk attacked affirmative action and named four specific Black women — Joy Reid, Michelle Obama, Sheila Jackson Lee, and Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson — saying that as “affirmative action picks” they had admitted that “you do not have the brain processing power to be taken really seriously,” a remark documented and archived by fact-checkers [1] [2]. Reporters and fact-checkers emphasize he was criticizing named individuals within a larger argument about affirmative action rather than issuing a generic statement about all Black women [1] [2].
2. How critics and outlets framed the remarks — broader vs. precise characterizations
Many news outlets and commentators presented Kirk’s comments as sweeping and racist, reporting that he demeaned Black women’s intelligence and qualifications; some headlines and social posts paraphrased the remark as “Black women do not have the brain processing power,” which amplified public outrage [5] [6]. Fact-checkers such as Lead Stories and Snopes said those wider paraphrases were not precise and clarified that Kirk’s target in that segment was four named figures [2] [1].
3. Corrections and pushback — where coverage shifted
After the initial wave of reporting and viral posts, several outlets issued corrections or clarifications noting the misquote or imprecise paraphrasing. The Financial Times published a correction that an earlier article had misquoted Kirk as saying “Black women do not have the brain processing power to be taken seriously,” specifying he had referred to particular women [3]. Other international outlets likewise noted instances of misquotation and clarified his narrower target [4] [3].
4. The broader record and competing interpretations
Beyond the July 2023 clip, outlets and longform pieces catalog Kirk’s history of incendiary comments on race and gender; Vanity Fair and The Guardian profile him as a provocateur with a record of racist and sexist rhetoric, and CBC and other reporters cited prior examples in assessing the significance of the July 2023 comments [7] [8] [6]. Those critics argue the pattern makes the narrower quote part of a larger pattern of demeaning language; defenders or clarifying journalists argue accuracy matters and that the clip targeted individuals, not all Black women [1] [2] [3].
5. Political and social fallout — why the phrasing mattered
The difference between a targeted attack on named public figures and a generalized insult of an entire demographic shaped responses from politicians, media and the public: some officials condemned the substance and placed it in a pattern of harmful rhetoric [9]; fact-checkers and some outlets stressed that misquoting widened the allegation and risked inflaming discourse based on an imprecise formulation [2] [3].
6. Limits of the available reporting and what’s not in these sources
Available sources document the quoted July 2023 segment, subsequent fact-checks, corrections, and broader reporting on Kirk’s rhetoric, but they do not provide Kirk’s own follow-up responses to this specific criticism (e.g., an apology or retraction) in these excerpts; available sources do not mention a public apology or a detailed rebuttal from Kirk addressing the misquoting or the underlying criticism directly [1] [2] [3]. They also do not include full transcripts of the episode beyond the excerpts fact-checked [1] [2].
7. Bottom line for readers — what to take away
Kirk’s July 2023 remarks about named Black women and affirmative action were real and recorded; fact-checkers confirm the clip but caution that some viral summaries overstated the scope of the insult by converting his comments about four figures into a blanket statement about “Black women” [1] [2]. Given the documented pattern of provocative rhetoric catalogued by outlets like Vanity Fair and The Guardian, readers should weigh both the precise wording and the broader context when assessing the seriousness and implications of the comments [7] [8].