Did Charlie Kirk say gun deaths were acceptable to support the second amendment?

Checked on September 23, 2025
Disclaimer: Factually can make mistakes. Please verify important information or breaking news. Learn more.

This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.

Was this fact-check helpful?

1. Summary of the results

The statement in question asks if Charlie Kirk said gun deaths were acceptable to support the second amendment. According to [1], Charlie Kirk is directly quoted as saying 'It’s worth it to have a cost of, unfortunately, some gun deaths every single year so that we can have the Second Amendment', which suggests that he believed gun deaths were an acceptable price to pay for the right to bear arms [1]. This viewpoint is also supported by [2], which quotes Kirk saying 'I think it's worth it. I think it's worth to have a cost of, unfortunately, some gun deaths every single year, so that we can have the Second Amendment to protect our other God-given rights' [2]. However, not all sources provide direct quotes or evidence to support this claim, with [2] and [3] providing more nuanced or indirect information on Kirk's stance [2] [3].

2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints

Some sources, such as [4] and [5], do not provide any relevant information about Charlie Kirk's statements on gun deaths or the second amendment, which may indicate a lack of comprehensive coverage of the topic [4] [5]. Additionally, [6] discusses Kirk's strong support for gun rights but does not provide direct quotes regarding his stance on gun deaths being acceptable to support the Second Amendment, highlighting the need for more direct evidence [6]. Alternative viewpoints, such as those presented in [7] and [8], focus on the context of gun laws and Kirk's involvement in the conservative movement, which may imply that he was willing to accept some level of gun violence as a trade-off for maintaining those rights [7] [8].

3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement

The original statement may be considered misleading or biased as it does not provide the full context of Charlie Kirk's quotes or the nuances of his stance on gun deaths and the second amendment. The sources that directly quote Kirk, such as [1] and [2], suggest that he did believe gun deaths were an acceptable price to pay for the right to bear arms, which may benefit those who support a strong interpretation of the second amendment [1] [2]. On the other hand, sources that do not provide direct evidence or quotes, such as [2] and [3], may benefit those who argue that Kirk's stance is being misrepresented or taken out of context [2] [3]. Ultimately, the framing of the original statement may influence the reader's perception of Charlie Kirk's views, highlighting the importance of considering multiple sources and viewpoints [2] [1] [4] [7] [3] [5] [6] [8].

Want to dive deeper?
What is Charlie Kirk's stance on gun control legislation?
How has Charlie Kirk responded to criticism about his second amendment views?
What are the statistics on gun deaths in the US since Charlie Kirk's statement?
How do other conservative figures view Charlie Kirk's comments on gun deaths?
What role does Turning Point USA play in promoting second amendment rights?