Fact check: Did charlie kirk say women shouldn't be allowed to vote

1. Summary of the results

The analyses provided do not support the claim that Charlie Kirk said women shouldn't be allowed to vote ^{[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7]}. In fact, none of the sources mention Charlie Kirk explicitly stating that women should not have the right to vote. However, some sources do mention his views on women prioritizing family and children over careers ^{[1] [7]}, and his controversial comments towards women, such as telling Taylor Swift to 'submit to her husband' ^[6]. Additionally, one source mentions that Charlie Kirk had guests on his podcast who held controversial views, including a pastor who believed women should not have the right to vote, but this does not indicate that Kirk himself held this view ^[2].

2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints

Some key context that is missing from the original statement is that Charlie Kirk's views on women's roles in society are complex and multifaceted ^{[1] [7]}. While he has made comments that can be seen as misogynistic or sexist, such as his remarks towards Taylor Swift ^[6], there is no evidence to suggest that he has explicitly stated that women should not be allowed to vote. Alternative viewpoints on this topic include the idea that women may vote differently than their spouses, which was discussed in one of the sources ^[3]. It is also worth considering the potential impact of Charlie Kirk's views on women's rights and empowerment, as well as the reactions of his fans and critics to his legacy ^[5]. Furthermore, the fact that Charlie Kirk had guests on his podcast with controversial views, including one who believed women should not have the right to vote, raises questions about his judgment and the company he keeps ^[2].

3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement

The original statement appears to be an example of potential misinformation or bias, as it claims that Charlie Kirk said women shouldn't be allowed to vote without providing any evidence to support this claim ^{[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7]}. This type of statement can be damaging to Charlie Kirk's reputation and may be used to mobilize opposition against him. Those who benefit from this framing include critics of Charlie Kirk who may use this statement to discredit him and his views ^[5]. On the other hand, fans and supporters of Charlie Kirk may be motivated to defend him against what they see as unfair or misleading criticism ^[5]. Ultimately, it is essential to approach this topic with a critical and nuanced perspective, considering multiple sources and viewpoints to form a well-rounded understanding of Charlie Kirk's views and legacy ^{[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7]}.