Did chuck schumer vote yes for the marytime drug enforcement act of 1986

1. What the MDLEA is and how it passed — a quick factual baseline

Congress created the Maritime Drug Law Enforcement Act in 1986 as part of the broader Anti‑Drug Abuse Act to expand U.S. law enforcement and prosecutorial reach over drug trafficking on the high seas; the statute authorized actions such as boarding foreign‑flagged vessels and widened jurisdictional rules ^{[1] [2]}. Library of Congress catalog entries for S.2878 and H.R.5484 document the MDLEA language and show it was embedded in major 1986 anti‑drug legislation ^{[2] [5]}.

2. The claim about Schumer’s vote — what the internet sources say

Several online posts and commentary sites state succinctly that “Chuck Schumer voted ‘Yes’ for the Maritime Drug Law Enforcement Act of 1986” and add that the broader bills passed overwhelmingly in Congress (citing counts such as House 392–16 and Senate 97–2 in those posts) ^{[3] [4]}. These posts present the claim as settled fact but do so without linking to original roll‑call records in the clips supplied here ^{[3] [4]}.

3. What the authoritative records in the provided set show — and the gap

The official legislative records included in your search results describe the MDLEA provisions and the bills that carried them (S.2878 and H.R.5484) and confirm the statute’s scope and placement within the Anti‑Drug Abuse Act of 1986 ^{[2] [5]}. Those Congressional entries do not, in the provided material, include a specific roll‑call vote sheet attributing a “Yes” vote to Senator Schumer; therefore the direct evidence of Schumer’s individual vote is not present in the current reporting (available sources do not mention Schumer’s specific roll‑call vote; ^[2]; p1_s6).

4. How reliable are the social and opinion sites claiming Schumer’s vote?

The repeating claim appears on discussion boards and partisan outlets that often repackage political talking points without attaching primary documentation ^{[3] [4]}. That pattern creates a risk: the claim may be true but the sources provided here do not show the primary evidence (roll‑call record) necessary to confirm it. Treat these citations as secondary reporting that requires a cross‑check against congressional voting records ^{[3] [4]}.

5. How to resolve the discrepancy — where to look next

To confirm Schumer’s vote conclusively, consult primary sources not included in the set you supplied: the Senate roll‑call for the relevant 1986 vote (Congressional Record or Senate roll call for the Anti‑Drug Abuse Act/MDLEA subtitle) or the official Library of Congress roll‑call pages for S.2878/H.R.5484. The provided Congress.gov bill pages confirm the statute and its provisions but do not show an individual Sen. Schumer roll call in the material at hand ^{[2] [5]}.

6. Context and political framing you should know

The MDLEA was enacted with bipartisan support and has been criticized and litigated over the years for its expansive jurisdictional reach; proponents emphasized stopping smuggling on the high seas, while critics later raised constitutional and due‑process concerns ^{[1] [6]}. The social posts framing Schumer’s vote are part of a broader political narrative aiming to link contemporary politicians to past tough‑on‑drugs measures — an implicit agenda that rewards straightforward vote counts but can obscure nuance about amendments, titles, or which section of a large anti‑drug bill an individual vote applied to ^{[3] [4] [1]}.

Limitations: the set of search results you provided includes authoritative legislative summaries and commentary sites but does not include the specific Senate roll‑call transcript or an official citation showing Schumer’s individual vote. Because the primary roll‑call is not in the available sources, I cannot assert definitively from this package that Schumer voted yes — only that multiple secondary posts claim he did and that Congress enacted the MDLEA in 1986 ^{[3] [4] [2] [5] [1]}.