Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
Fact check: What does Hillary Clinton and Barrack Obama have to do with the Epstein files?
1. Summary of the results
Based on the analyses provided, Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama's connection to the Epstein files is primarily through unsubstantiated claims made by Donald Trump on Truth Social. The evidence shows:
Hillary Clinton's actual connection: Hillary Clinton's name appears in the third batch of unsealed documents related to the Jeffrey Epstein case, but there are no accusations or allegations against her [1]. Additionally, Bill Clinton (not Hillary) is mentioned in court files alongside Prince Andrew [2].
Barack Obama's connection: There is no direct evidence linking Barack Obama to the Epstein files in the actual court documents. His name only appears in connection with Trump's baseless claims [3].
Trump's claims: Trump posted on Truth Social that the Epstein files were written by Obama, "Crooked Hillary," Comey, Brennan, and members of the Biden administration [4]. He further claimed these files were created by the same people who created the "FAKE Hillary Clinton/Christopher Steele Dossier" [3].
2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints
The original question lacks crucial context about the distinction between actual court documents and political accusations:
- The Justice Department released a memo stating there was no evidence of a "client list" or blackmail by Epstein, and his death was ruled a suicide, though conspiracy theories continue to circulate [5].
- Trump's claims appear to be a deflection strategy as he faces scrutiny over the Epstein case, with sources reporting that Trump is defending Attorney General Pam Bondi and accusing his "so-called friends" in MAGA of caring too much about the case [3].
- Trump benefits politically from redirecting attention away from his own potential connections to Epstein by making unsubstantiated claims about Democratic figures [3].
- The timing is significant: these claims emerged as Trump faced "a revolt from his MAGA base over the Epstein files" [4], suggesting a strategic motivation to shift blame.
3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement
The original question contains an implicit assumption that both Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama have substantive connections to the Epstein files. This framing is potentially misleading because:
- It conflates unsubstantiated political accusations with documented evidence. While Hillary Clinton's name appears in unsealed documents without any allegations against her [1], Barack Obama has no documented connection to the actual Epstein files.
- The question may perpetuate conspiracy theories by treating Trump's "baseless claims" [3] as if they have equal weight to factual court documents.
- It lacks the critical context that these connections are primarily based on Trump's Truth Social posts rather than evidence from the actual Epstein investigation or court proceedings.
The question would be more accurate if it asked specifically about the difference between documented mentions in court files versus political accusations made about these figures in relation to the Epstein case.