Https://factually.co/%20fact-checks/politics/compare-ice-raids-obama-vs-trump-
Executive summary
The core question — did ICE raids and interior immigration enforcement differ between the Obama and Trump administrations — has a complex answer: Obama presided over higher aggregate removals and formal deportations and shifted tactics toward targeted, non‑public workplace enforcement, while Trump broadened priorities and, at times, used more public raids and expanded at‑large community arrests, though arrest rates and reporting varied across periods and sources [1] [2] [3] [4]. Analysts and advocates disagree about whether one era was categorically “worse”; the record shows differing priorities, methods, and public visibility rather than a single simple metric that crowns one administration as uniformly more aggressive [5] [6].
1. How the two administrations framed priorities and who was targeted
The Obama administration emphasized prioritizing removals of noncitizens deemed public‑safety or national‑security risks and focused enforcement resources on formal removals rather than broad sweeps, a shift reflected in policy guidance issued in 2014 and in higher counts of formal removals during his years in office [1] [3]. By contrast, Trump’s executive orders explicitly broadened interior enforcement priorities and signaled fewer limits on collateral arrests and the scope of targets, which led to stated plans for wider enforcement including raids in new venues and greater emphasis on numbers [3] [4].
2. Tactics and visibility: raids, workplaces, and “silent” enforcement
Operationally, Obama moved away from large‑scale public workplace raids toward “silent raids” such as employer I‑9 audits and administrative penalties aimed at employers, reducing the spectacle of mass arrests even while enforcement continued [2]. The Trump era revived more visible workplace and community arrests—documented large raids in 2017 and renewed large‑scale actions in later Trump periods—and Trump officials often touted arrest totals as a performance metric, increasing public visibility and political attention to raids [2] [3].
3. Numbers aren’t the whole story: removals, arrests, and reporting quirks
Counting enforcement by simple arrest totals obscures important differences: Obama’s administration recorded large numbers of formal removals—Migration Policy notes formal removals under Obama outpaced prior administrations—while TRAC and other data show interior administrative arrests fluctuated, and ICE reporting practices (including pauses in daily metrics) complicate direct comparisons across eras [1] [5] [7]. Independent trackers and journalists caution that headline “raid” counts often mix different categories—at‑large community arrests, workplace actions, jail‑based transfers and border removals—making apples‑to‑apples comparisons difficult [3] [5].
4. Demographics and civil‑liberties concerns
Analyses found shifts in demographics encountered by ICE: for example, ICE encountered and arrested a higher proportion of women early in the Trump administration compared with Obama’s final year, and civil‑liberties groups documented harms and alleged abuses across administrations—highlighting that enforcement intensity translates into different human impacts depending on tactics and oversight [6] [8]. Advocacy groups and legal defenders, who have catalogued hundreds of raids and produced toolkits to resist and document ICE tactics, argue that both public raids and quieter enforcement produced community trauma and civil‑rights harms [9] [8].
5. What the sources agree and where they diverge
Reporting and research concur that both administrations expanded ICE’s technical capacity and that policy choices shaped who was prioritized and how arrests were executed, but they diverge on interpretation: some trackers show interior apprehensions were lower than earlier peaks under Obama-era Secure Communities even as they rose relative to Obama’s last two years, while others emphasize Trump-era surges in at‑large arrests in specific periods and controversies over counting methods [5] [4] [7]. The upshot is that comparisons require attention to specific metrics—formal removals, workplace raids, at‑large community arrests—and to changes in reporting practice and agency guidance rather than a single binary judgment [1] [3].
6. Bottom line for readers trying to compare “raids” across presidencies
A faithful comparison must disaggregate tactics, targets, and metrics: Obama shifted toward targeted removals and employer‑focused enforcement while presiding over high numbers of formal removals; Trump broadened priorities, increased public raids and at‑large arrests at times, and politicized arrest counts, producing different patterns of visibility and community impact [1] [2] [4]. Existing public sources document these contrasts but also show gaps and methodological differences—meaning any definitive ranking depends on which measures one privileges and how one accounts for reporting changes [5] [7].