How did Obama-era migrant detention facilities compare to later administrations?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
Under Obama, average daily ICE detention generally ran between about 30,000 and 40,000 people and his administration formally removed roughly 3 million non‑citizens over two terms [1] [2]. Later administrations—especially the second Trump administration in 2025—significantly expanded detention: ICE custody rose to nearly 66,000 by November 2025 (about a 70% increase since January 2025) and officials pursued rapid capacity boosts including reopening family facilities and planning use of Guantánamo Bay and military sites [3] [4] [5] [6].
1. Capacity and scale: from tens of thousands to plans for six‑figure detention
Obama‑era detention held an average daily population commonly cited between roughly 30,000–40,000 people [1]. By contrast, reporting from late 2025 shows ICE custody nearing 66,000 people in November 2025 — an increase of about 70% since January of that year — and numerous accounts of the new administration seeking to triple capacity and to detain tens of thousands more, including in reopened or repurposed private facilities and on military bases such as Guantánamo Bay [3] [4] [6] [5].
2. Detention of families and children: a policy thread through administrations
Family detention has been a recurring element of U.S. immigration enforcement. The Obama administration made large use of family detention and, in 2014, even relied on military bases to hold children temporarily [7]. The second Trump administration announced plans in 2025 to reopen facilities to detain families together — a policy move that revived approaches used under Obama and later paused under Biden — and to expand family detention capacity rapidly [6] [7].
3. Private contractors and profit incentives: continuity and expansion
Private, for‑profit facilities were used under Obama and remained central later; reporting notes “tens of thousands” were held in private facilities under both the Obama and Biden years [4]. In 2025 the Trump administration accelerated contracts with private prison operators, reopening or repurposing shuttered facilities and expanding deals that critics warn could create profit incentives to grow detention capacity [4] [6].
4. Conditions and public images: photos, lawsuits and competing claims
Images and litigation have linked poor conditions to multiple administrations. Some of the most widely circulated photos showing migrants wrapped in Mylar sheets were taken in 2015 during Obama’s presidency, a fact‑check that complicated claims that such images were solely a later administration’s legacy [8]. Yet advocacy groups and investigative reports in 2025 documented alleged mistreatment, hunger strikes and other abusive practices in newly expanded sites such as Guantánamo Bay and other facilities [6]. The record shows recurring problems across administrations rather than an exclusive responsibility of any single president [8] [6].
5. Removals and enforcement intensity: numerical comparisons and limits of interpretation
Obama formally removed approximately 3 million non‑citizens over two terms, which the Department of Homeland Security counted as a historic high for removals [2]. Later reporting on removals in early 2025 shows intensive deportation activity — for example, nearly 5,700 removals in two weeks after the 2025 inauguration — but monthly and procedural differences complicate direct comparisons: removals can include border “turn‑backs” as well as interior ICE actions, and counting methods differ across years [9] [2].
6. Policy shifts, infrastructure strain, and political intent
Reporting from 2025 describes urgent infrastructure strain: ICE bed numbers, a lack of family‑geared facilities, and plans to use nontraditional sites such as military bases and foreign facilities to meet detention goals [10] [7] [5]. Those operational moves matched a political push by the 2025 administration toward mass removals and deterrence strategies; critics and watchdogs have tied that push to expansion efforts by private operators and expedited enforcement directives [4] [6].
7. What the sources don’t settle: quality, legal accountability, and long‑term outcomes
Available sources document scale, plans and many allegations of mistreatment, but they do not provide a unified, audited comparison of overall detainee living‑condition quality across administrations or a single accounting of how many detainees were in family vs. adult facilities across all years. Detailed, comparable metrics on per‑detainee conditions, medical care outcomes, or uniformly measured abuse incidents across presidencies are not provided in the current reporting (not found in current reporting).
Conclusion — competing narratives, common problems
The sources show both continuity and escalation: detention infrastructure, private contractors and family detention were present under Obama and expanded or repurposed under later administrations, while 2025 reporting documents a dramatic rise in detained populations, renewed use of military sites, and a political drive to rapidly increase removals [1] [4] [6] [3]. Different camps emphasize different facts — defenders point to historic removal totals under Obama [2], while critics emphasize the sharper expansion and novel sites used in 2025 [5] [6] — but the reporting converges on a policy arena marked by recurring legal fights, infrastructure strain and persistent concerns about treatment [8] [6].