Congress votes to impeach trump

1. What the House actually voted on and when

House members introduced several distinct resolutions in the 119th Congress: H.Res.353 sets out seven articles of impeachment including obstruction, bribery, and “tyranny” ^[5], H.Res.537 focused on abuse of presidential war powers ^[6], and H.Res.939 was filed in December 2025 to initiate another impeachment effort ^[7]. On June 24, 2025 the House voted on a motion to table H.Res.537 and the motion carried 344–79, effectively shelving that particular resolution at the time ^{[3] [8]}. Later, on December 11, 2025 a separate procedural roll call shows 140 members voting to advance articles associated with Al Green’s impeachment push, a figure cited by advocacy groups as a renewed floor-level move to impeach ^{[1] [2]}.

2. How this fits into Trump’s impeachment history

This is neither the first nor the second time Trump has faced impeachment proceedings: the House previously adopted two articles in December 2019 for abuse of power and obstruction of Congress, and later in January 2021 adopted one article for incitement of insurrection—both of which led to Senate trials that ended in acquittal ^{[9] [10] [11] [12]}. Those precedents frame current strategy and messaging for lawmakers who argue impeachment is a constitutional duty and for opponents who cite prior acquittals as evidence of futility ^{[9] [11]}.

3. Legal mechanics and the Senate hurdle

Under the Constitution, the House must approve articles of impeachment by a simple majority to “impeach,” after which the Senate holds a trial and must secure a two‑thirds majority to convict and remove the president from office; that supermajority requirement remains the principal legal obstacle to removal ^[4]. The June and December votes in the House were primarily procedural maneuvers—motions to table, referrals, or votes to advance articles—which determine whether an article reaches a final House vote, not whether a conviction in the Senate is likely ^{[3] [1]}.

4. Political context and the forces pushing for impeachment

A coalition of activist groups and progressive lawmakers has actively campaigned for renewed impeachment efforts, framing new alleged abuses—ranging from foreign policy decisions to alleged threats against judges and members of Congress—as impeachable offenses and using petitions and public pressure to expand support ^{[2] [7]}. Conversely, large bipartisan margins against some impeachment measures—such as the 344–79 table vote in June—show significant resistance in the House at certain moments, reflecting electoral calculations, institutional caution, or strategic concerns about repeating a process that previously ended in a Senate acquittal ^{[3] [8] [11]}.

5. What the votes mean going forward

House floor activity in 2025–2026 signals that impeachment remains an active, if uneven, avenue for congressional dissent against the president: multiple resolutions document specific allegations and force members to take public positions, but actual removal would require overcoming the Senate’s two‑thirds barrier and sustaining political momentum beyond activist-driven milestones ^{[5] [1] [4]}. The record shows that procedural wins—advancing articles or defeating motions to table—are important for narrative and constituent signaling even where a conviction appears unlikely, and opponents will continue to frame such efforts as partisan or symbolic ^{[2] [3] [7]}.

In sum, the House has moved repeatedly on impeachment during the 119th Congress with competing resolutions and notable procedural votes that both advanced and tabled articles; these steps constitute formal congressional action to impeach but do not, by themselves, overcome the constitutional and political barriers to conviction and removal in the Senate ^{[5] [1] [3] [4]}.