Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
Fact check: Can congressional staff members take on other jobs during a government shutdown?
Executive Summary
Congressional staff are not categorically barred from taking outside work during a government shutdown, but significant legal limits, reporting requirements, and office-specific approvals apply, and publicly available reporting on pandemic-era and 2025 shutdowns shows confusion and financial strain among staff. The clearest rules are for Senate employees—who may hold outside positions with supervisory and Committee approval and income limits—while House staff rules are less centrally published, leaving practical permissions to individual offices and ethics rules [1] [2] [3].
1. What people are claiming—and what matters most to staffers
Multiple contemporary accounts focus on the financial hardship congressional staff face during shutdowns, and the central claim under scrutiny is whether staff may accept other jobs to replace lost pay. Reporting documents staff anxiety and missed paychecks but does not definitively state a universal prohibition or permission for outside employment across Congress, leaving the question unresolved in news coverage [3] [4] [5]. Legislative efforts and votes to retroactively pay federal workers during the 2025 shutdown are discussed in reporting, but these stories center on federal employees broadly rather than the technical ethics and employment rules that govern congressional aides [6] [7] [8].
2. Senate employees: written rules, approvals, and limits that matter now
The U.S. Senate Select Committee on Ethics explicitly allows Senate staff to hold outside employment but imposes constraints: supervisory approval, Committee oversight, reporting of income, and limits on outside earnings. These rules require employees to seek permission from their employing Senator and to comply with ethics reporting requirements; the Committee also enforces thresholds and post‑employment restrictions that can affect what kinds of outside work are permissible [1] [9]. The existence of these formal rules means a furloughed or unpaid Senate aide cannot universally assume they may take any job without prior clearance and reporting.
3. House staff: sparser centralized guidance and more dependence on offices
By contrast, centralized, up-to-date public guidance on outside employment for House staff is less prominent in the cited materials; Members of Congress face statutory limits on outside income and conflict-of-interest rules, and the Congressional Institute explains a 15% earnings threshold for Members, but analogous, uniformly published House staff rules are not evident in the available sources, so permissions often depend on individual Member offices and House ethics guidance not captured in the provided documents [2]. That administrative gap creates variability in practice during shutdowns, meaning staff must consult their employing office and House ethics resources before taking outside work [3].
4. Practical constraints: conflict-of-interest, time, and retroactive pay risks
Even where rules permit outside employment, conflict-of-interest prohibitions, hours expectations, and the potential for retroactive pay or back-pay legislation complicate decisions. News coverage of the 2025 shutdown shows federal workers and Capitol Hill aides weighing short-term survival against political uncertainty; if Congress later authorizes back pay, outside earnings and reporting could introduce legal and tax complexities [6] [7] [4]. Staff must therefore navigate not just permission but downstream consequences, including ethics reviews and financial disclosure obligations that could affect eligibility for certain positions.
5. What the coverage omits and where biases may shape narratives
News accounts emphasize human hardship and political debates over back pay but omit granular office-by-office ethics procedures and the full range of statutory guidance, generating ambiguous public impressions that may understate the formal restrictions that apply to staff seeking outside work [8] [5]. Institutional sources like the Senate Ethics FAQs provide procedural detail but may reflect an interest in portraying a regulated, orderly process; conversely, labor-focused reporting highlights staff vulnerability and may underplay procedural protections or prohibitions [1] [3]. Readers should note these complementary but partial agendas.
6. The recent policy context and why timing changes calculus
Legislative activity in October 2025—bills and Senate votes about paying federal workers during a shutdown—shaped the practical decision framework for staff considering outside jobs; uncertainty about whether and when back pay would arrive increases the urgency for aides to seek alternative income, but that urgency does not erase ethics and reporting requirements [6] [7] [8]. The contemporaneous reporting underscores that the question is both legal and tactical: staff must assess immediate needs against the risk of noncompliance with office rules and potential retroactive financial adjustments.
7. Bottom line and practical next steps for staff seeking clarity
There is no blanket ban on congressional staff taking other jobs during a shutdown, but the safe and legal path requires consulting your employing Member or Senator, reviewing Senate or House ethics guidance, and filing any required approvals or disclosures before accepting outside work. Given variable public guidance—detailed for Senate employees but less centralized for House aides—staff should seek written approval from supervisors and the appropriate ethics office to avoid conflict-of-interest violations or reporting breaches [1] [9] [2] [3].