How much has the Conservative Party received from pro-Israel donors compared with the Labour Party since 2019?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
Declassified UK’s investigations and related reporting show pro‑Israel donors and lobby groups have given significantly more money and hospitality to Conservative MPs than to Labour MPs since 2019: Declassified records attribute over £430,000 of donations/hospitality to Conservative MPs (mostly via trips) and over £280,000 to Labour MPs, while the wider dataset of pro‑Israel giving to MPs in their careers totals more than £1 million (including 130 Conservatives and 41 Labour MPs) [1] [2] [3].
1. The headline numbers: Conservatives receive more recorded trips and hospitality
Declassified UK’s reporting finds pro‑Israel organisations and associated donors paid for Conservative MPs’ visits to Israel on many more occasions and at higher recorded value than Labour equivalents: the Conservatives’ trips/hospitality totalled “over £430,000” across 187 occasions, while Declassified puts Labour MPs’ receipts at “over £280,000” [1] [2]. Declassified also reports CFI funded 118 sitting Conservative MPs on trips (160 occasions) contributing “over £330,000” [4] [1].
2. Broader dataset: more MPs, more money when career donations are included
When Declassified aggregates donors, individuals and organisations over MPs’ political careers, it reports around 180 of 650 MPs have accepted funding from pro‑Israel sources — 130 Conservative MPs and 41 Labour MPs — and that the total value of donations from pro‑Israel groups, individuals and Israeli state institutions “amounts to over one million pounds” [3]. That wider figure includes earlier periods and multiple donor categories beyond the 2019–present window cited in some pieces [3].
3. Key donors and patterns named in the reporting
Reporting identifies repeat donors and intermediaries who give to both parties. Trevor Chinn is named as a major giver to Labour figures (about £195,210 to Labour MPs, including a £50,000 donation to Starmer’s 2020 leadership campaign), while individuals associated with Conservative Friends of Israel (CFI) — such as Trevor Pears, Michael Lewis, David Meller and Lord Kalms — have supported senior Conservatives [2] [3]. Declassified and allied outlets also highlight organisations that fund trips (CFI, ELNET, Israel’s ministry) as well as private donors and corporate links [4] [5].
4. What “donations” include: trips, hospitality and declared gifts
The pieces make clear much of the recorded value comes from paid trips and hospitality rather than direct cash handed to party war chests. Declassified counts the value of donations or hospitality in MPs’ registers and Electoral Commission disclosures for funded visits, stating the “value of the donations or hospitality amounts to over £430,000” for Conservatives and noting Labour MPs’ funded visits value over £64,000 just for LFI‑organised trips [1] [2]. That distinction matters when comparing party income: party receipts and individual MP benefits are not identical.
5. Disagreements, limitations and what reporting does not settle
Different outlets and pieces use overlapping but not identical datasets and timeframes. Declassified’s figures cover declared trips and donations to MPs and are explicit about methodology; other commentators (Mondoweiss, Al Mayadeen, and others republishing Declassified findings) echo or emphasise particular totals but sometimes conflate career totals with post‑2019 giving [6] [4] [7]. Available sources do not mention a single authoritative government dataset that tallies all pro‑Israel donations to the Conservative and Labour parties specifically since 2019 as party receipts; they instead compile MPs’ declared hospitality and donor records [3] [2] [1].
6. Competing narratives and possible agendas behind the figures
Investigations emphasise how pro‑Israel funding aligns with strong parliamentary groups (CFI/LFI) and target influence — framing the story as lobbying with policy consequences [3] [2]. Advocacy sites and some commentators stress the ethical implications (e.g., links to settlement‑linked companies or wartime contexts) and press for donor scrutiny [8] [9]. Conversely, pro‑Israel groups and some donors are presented in sources as cross‑party actors who fund both Labour and Conservative figures; the data show both parties accept such hospitality and donations [2] [3].
7. How to interpret the comparison responsibly
The available investigations establish that, by recorded value of trips and declared hospitality since 2019, Conservatives received a larger share in Declassified’s dataset (over £430k vs over £280k for Labour in the cited pieces), and that across MPs’ careers pro‑Israel giving documented by Declassified exceeds £1m with a heavier Conservative exposure (130 vs 41 MPs) [1] [2] [3]. Readers should note the difference between money logged as hospitality/trips to individual MPs and donations to a party’s central funds: the sources do not provide a single consolidated, audited figure of party‑level receipts from pro‑Israel donors since 2019 [3] [2].
If you want, I can extract specific named donors, list which MPs or ministers were reported as recipients, or summarise Declassified’s methodology so you can judge the robustness of the comparison [3] [2] [1].