Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
Fact check: What constitutional barriers exist to prevent state secession in America?
1. Summary of the results
The constitutional barriers preventing state secession in America are extensive and well-established through multiple legal and historical precedents. The Supreme Court case Texas v. White definitively established that states enter an "indissoluble relation" when joining the Union [1]. This ruling explicitly declared the union between states as "complete, perpetual, and indissoluble" [2]. Modern legal interpretation, including statements from Justice Antonin Scalia, has reinforced that "there is no right to secede" [2].
2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints
While secession is constitutionally prohibited, there are theoretical paths that aren't commonly discussed:
- Revolution
- Consent of other states
- Negotiated departure through federal negotiations [2]
Historical context is crucial to understanding this issue. President Andrew Jackson's Proclamation of 1832 explicitly rejected secession as a constitutional right, and tensions over state nullification and the Fugitive Slave Act ultimately contributed to the Civil War [3]. Constitutional scholar Akhil Reed Amar notes that while states cannot secede, individuals maintain the right to emigrate - essentially, people can leave, but they can't take the land with them [1].
3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement
The question itself might suggest there's ambiguity about secession rights, when in fact there is remarkable legal consensus on this issue. Constitutional scholars "unanimously agree that secession is not legally permissible" with experts noting that "almost no lawyer would take that argument seriously" [2]. The Supremacy Clause in Article 6 further reinforces federal authority over state independence [1].
Those who might benefit from promoting secession narratives include:
- State-level politicians seeking to rally support through sovereignty messaging
- Political movements looking to challenge federal authority
- Groups attempting to negotiate better terms with the federal government by threatening secession
Meanwhile, federal institutions and constitutional scholars have a vested interest in maintaining the current interpretation of perpetual union.