Is there any credible evidence or reporting that Donald Trump and Bill Clinton had a sexual relationship?

1. What the recent reporting actually says: investigations, emails and associations

News coverage in November 2025 highlights newly released Epstein-related emails and President Trump’s public call for a Justice Department probe into Epstein’s ties with Bill Clinton and institutions like JPMorgan, following House Oversight releases that also raised questions about Trump’s own ties to Epstein — but the stories detail travel, socializing and email exchanges rather than any allegation that Clinton and Trump had a sexual relationship with one another ^{[5] [6] [1] [2]}.

2. On Epstein documents: mentions of Clinton and Trump, not mutual sexual relations

Reporting on the released emails notes Epstein discussed or referenced both Trump and Clinton in different contexts and that Clinton flew on Epstein’s plane several times before Epstein’s 2008 conviction; outlets stressed those contacts and the larger question of who knew what about Epstein’s crimes, without asserting or providing evidence that Clinton and Trump had a sexual relationship with each other ^{[1] [2] [7]}.

3. Historical allegations about each man are separate and documented differently

Background coverage shows longstanding, separate histories of sexual-misconduct allegations for Bill Clinton (Lewinsky, Paula Jones and other accusers) and multiple allegations against Donald Trump, including the public “Access Hollywood” tape and numerous accusers — these are treated as distinct matters in reporting and summaries, not as evidence of a sexual relationship between the two men ^{[4] [3] [8]}.

4. What major outlets and reviews explicitly state (or don’t)

Reuters, BBC, NBC and others in the provided set report investigations, email releases and associations with Epstein but either explicitly say no credible evidence has surfaced tying Clinton to Epstein’s trafficking or emphasize that relationships were social — and none of these reports present evidence that Clinton and Trump engaged in a sexual relationship together ^{[5] [2] [1]}. When outlets note contacts, they also often say there’s “no credible evidence” of involvement in Epstein’s sex trafficking for some figures mentioned ^[5].

5. Alternative viewpoints and political context

Trump’s public push for an investigation into Clinton’s ties to Epstein is presented in reporting as both a substantive request and a political move to shift scrutiny amid questions about Trump’s own Epstein connections; critics quoted in coverage view the timing as deflection, while the administration framed it as seeking accountability — this political motive is explicitly reported alongside the facts about the emails ^{[6] [2] [7]}.

6. Limits of the available sources and what they do not say

Available reporting in the provided results does not mention any credible evidence or reputable reporting that Bill Clinton and Donald Trump had a sexual relationship with each other; if you seek proof of such a claim, those sources do not report it ^{[1] [2] [5]}. They also do not present court findings or victim testimony alleging a sexual relationship between the two men ^{[1] [2]}.

7. How to judge new or fringe claims if they appear

If you encounter assertions online claiming a sexual relationship between Clinton and Trump, weigh them against major reporting and primary documents cited above: credible claims would be corroborated by mainstream investigative outlets, court records, or verified first‑person testimony — none of which appear in the provided coverage ^{[5] [1] [2]}. Reports here are focused on Epstein’s contacts and investigations, not on a sexual relationship between the former presidents ^{[5] [1]}.

Bottom line: reporting in these sources documents separate associations of both men with Jeffrey Epstein and long-standing separate allegations about each, but it does not provide or cite credible evidence that Donald Trump and Bill Clinton had a sexual relationship with one another ^{[5] [1] [2] [3] [4]}.