What are Dan Crenshaw’s major legislative accomplishments and authored bills since 2019?
Executive summary
Dan Crenshaw’s congressional portfolio since 2019 combines homeland security and military-related measures with a growing docket on health, technology and regulatory matters; his repertoire includes both standalone bills he has sponsored and a string of high-profile cosponsored efforts [1] [2]. He sits on relevant committees that shape his priorities and has a record of introducing a mix of narrow technical fixes and politically charged proposals that have seen mixed success on the floor and in broader legislative vehicles [3] [4].
1. Committee placement and legislative posture: where Crenshaw works and why it matters
Assignment to the Energy and Commerce Committee in the 117th Congress gave Crenshaw jurisdictional reach over health, technology and regulatory matters and explains the shift in some of his bills toward those topics as well as his ability to propose amendments to large package bills [3]. That committee role, combined with his veteran background, has shaped bills that straddle national security and veterans’ health, while his lawmaking approach mixes sponsorship of technical bills and high-profile amendments intended to shape national debates [3] [2].
2. Homeland-security and border integrity bills—early, signature priorities
One of Crenshaw’s earlier sponsored bills in Congress was the Anti‑Border Corruption Improvement Act (H.R.1609), introduced in March 2019 and referred to the House Homeland Security Subcommittee on Border Security, which reflects his emphasis on border oversight and anti‑corruption measures [1]. His legislative record contains multiple homeland and national‑security–oriented entries consistent with his campaign themes and committee interests, although many of these measures remained at the committee-referral stage rather than becoming enacted statutes [1] [4].
3. Military, veterans and health measures—veteran-focused sponsorship and psychedelic‑therapy research
Crenshaw has sponsored bills addressing military youth access (for example, an early effort to include homeschooled students in JROTC units, H.R.1258) and has repeatedly framed veterans’ health as a priority; he also introduced language to fund research into psychedelic therapies for PTSD and traumatic brain injury treatment for service members, signaling a policy interest beyond traditional defense spending [1] [2] [5]. These proposals have attracted attention because they pair Crenshaw’s SEAL background with bipartisan interest in alternative therapies, though passages into law have been uneven and some provisions were later entangled in larger legislative maneuvers [2].
4. High‑profile cosponsorships and controversial proposals: COVID-era foreign‑liability bill and 9/11 fund extension
In April 2020 Crenshaw and Sen. Tom Cotton introduced legislation to permit civil suits against foreign states for injury or death tied to pandemics—an initiative born from calls to hold foreign governments accountable for COVID‑19 impacts and which was politically charged from the outset [2] [5]. He also cosponsored an early effort to extend time limits under the September 11th Victim Compensation Fund Act, a widely publicized bipartisan measure intended to aid 9/11 victims’ claims [2] [5].
5. Amendments, floor strategy and mixed results in major bills
Crenshaw has pursued policy not only through standalone bills but via amendments to large packages—most notably an amendment on biological sex in sports and related provisions that media report was removed from a major spending bill after parliamentary review in 2025, underscoring the limits of amendment strategy in a closely divided Senate [2]. That episode illustrates his tactic of using high‑visibility amendments to force votes or elevate issues, but also shows the vulnerability of such measures to procedural gates like the Senate Parliamentarian [2].
6. Volume of sponsorship and tracking—many introduced, few enacted into law
Nonpartisan bill trackers show Crenshaw as an active bill sponsor with dozens of introduced measures across Congresses, and external services list his sponsored bills and activity, but a substantial share of those bills have been referred to committees or otherwise stalled rather than becoming enacted statutes—a pattern common to many members who introduce technical or policy proposals but lack the coalition for passage [4] [6]. Public trackers such as Congress.gov, BillTrack50 and LegiScan catalog his sponsored bills and actions, providing the finest-grain record of what he has authored and the procedural fate of each item [7] [4] [6].
7. Political context, accountability and alternate readings of impact
Supporters frame Crenshaw’s record as pragmatic: military‑informed reforms, veterans’ care initiatives and tech/health bills reflecting committee leverage, while critics point to high-profile but unsuccessful amendments and to a legislative hit rate that, by many trackers’ counts, has produced relatively few enacted signature solo bills—an alternative reading that highlights process and outcome rather than intent [3] [4] [6]. The public record documents what he introduced and when, but does not always show legislative adoption, leaving the judgment of “major accomplishment” dependent on whether one weighs sponsorship and agenda-setting or enacted law as the key metric [7] [4].