What experience does Dan Flood of TPUSA have?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
Publicly available profiles and news snippets identify Dan (Daniel) Flood as a Turning Point USA (TPUSA) security director or head of security with prior roles in corporate procurement/asset management and at veterinary-supply and security firms; company directory snapshots and reporting list him as TPUSA’s security lead and place him at the scene after Charlie Kirk was shot [1] [2]. Social posts and commentary note his profile was once on TPUSA’s team pages and that various rumors and conspiracy videos have circulated about his background and alleged outside ties [3] [4] [5].
1. Who is Dan Flood inside TPUSA — the official portrait
Multiple online directories and local reporting identify Dan (Daniel) Flood as Turning Point USA’s security director or head of security; news coverage describing the immediate response after Charlie Kirk was shot explicitly names “Dan Flood, Turning Point USA’s security director” as among those who jumped into a van at the scene [1]. TPUSA’s own team page historically listed staff profiles and social posts indicate a page for “danflood” once existed on tpusa.com [3] [6]. These citations together show Flood has been publicly presented as TPUSA’s security lead [1] [3].
2. Professional résumé outside TPUSA — corporate and procurement roles
Business contact databases and recruiter-style profiles attribute to Daniel Flood prior roles in asset management, procurement/sourcing and technology-strategy positions, including work at MWI Animal Health / MWI Veterinary Supply and a Rockhouse Integrity Group role described as a protection or security-related executive, and list a Bachelor of Science from Texas A&M University–Commerce [7] [8] [2]. These commercial listings portray a hybrid background spanning operational intelligence (in snippets), procurement/asset management and security-related private-sector work [7] [8].
3. Conflicting signposts and holes in the public record
Databases and third‑party aggregators (ZoomInfo, RocketReach, Datanyze) provide overlapping but not fully consistent job titles and histories; they focus on contact and employment snapshots rather than a verified CV [7] [8] [2]. TPUSA’s current official team pages (as captured) do not present a detailed, corroborated biography for Flood, and some social posts note his TPUSA profile was removed or is no longer available on tpusa.com [3] [6]. Available sources do not publish a comprehensive, independently verified employment timeline or public résumé with dates and responsibilities.
4. Role during the Kirk shooting — contemporaneous reporting
Local reporting that recounts the immediate aftermath of Charlie Kirk being shot names Flood among people who responded on-site, referring to him as TPUSA’s security director and placing him in actions taken at the scene [1]. That reporting confirms Flood’s operational role in TPUSA’s security apparatus at a critical moment; it does not, however, provide an exhaustive account of his specific duties or chain-of-command inside the organization [1].
5. Rumors, theories and online speculation — what’s circulating
Outside of mainstream reporting and business directories, there is a proliferation of speculative content: a Times of India story quotes Candace Owens relaying an allegation that Kirk messaged Flood the night before his death, and multiple fringe sites and videos promote conspiracy theories linking Flood to foreign intelligence or to coercion narratives [9] [4] [5]. These pieces amplify suspicion but are not equivalent to verified evidence; they are chiefly remarketing allegations, social posts, and opinion videos rather than authoritative records [9] [4] [5].
6. What the sources do not show — limits of the record
Available sources do not include a verified CV with dates, official TPUSA HR documentation, primary interviews with Flood, public records establishing ties to foreign intelligence, or an authoritative statement from TPUSA detailing his complete employment history and duties [7] [8] [2] [1] [3]. In other words, claims about deep-state ties or criminal culpability appear only in speculative outlets and social posts, not in the business directory or the local reporting that identifies him as security director [4] [5].
7. How to weigh competing claims — a practical guide
Treat directory entries and local reporting that name Flood as TPUSA’s security director and list prior corporate employers as baseline, documentable facts [7] [8] [2] [1]. Treat social-media allegations, conspiracy videos, and articles making extraordinary claims about intelligence links or roles in criminal plots as unverified until backed by primary evidence such as official filings, contemporaneous primary-source documents, or credible investigative reporting [9] [4] [5]. Note explicitly that some high‑profile claims (e.g., messages the night before Kirk’s death or alleged Mossad links) originate in second‑hand statements or fringe commentary and lack corroboration in the cited reporting [9] [4].
8. Bottom line — what we can say with confidence
Daniel (Dan) Flood is publicly identified in multiple sources as Turning Point USA’s security director or head of security and appears in local reporting about the Kirk shooting as such; business directories supplement that image with prior roles in asset management, procurement and security-related private firms [7] [8] [2] [1]. Allegations tying him to foreign intelligence or to orchestrating crimes circulate online but are not substantiated in the cited reporting and remain unverified [9] [4] [5].