David Duke endorses who?

1. Summary of the results

Based on the analyses provided, David Duke has endorsed multiple candidates across different election cycles, demonstrating a pattern of shifting political allegiances rather than consistent support for a single individual.

The sources reveal that Duke has endorsed:

• Donald Trump during his presidential campaigns, with Paul Ryan rebuking Trump over this endorsement ^[1], and Duke stating he was "100 percent behind" Trump's agenda, believing "Trump voters are his voters" ^[2]
• Jill Stein of the Green Party, citing her stance against what he termed "Jewish power" and Israel's military campaign ^{[3] [4]}
• Tulsi Gabbard during her 2020 presidential campaign ^[4]

The analyses show Duke's endorsements span across party lines, from Republican (Trump) to Green Party (Stein) to Democratic (Gabbard), indicating his support is based on specific policy positions rather than party affiliation.

2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints

The original question lacks crucial temporal context - Duke's endorsements have varied significantly over time and across different election cycles. The question implies a single, current endorsement when the reality is more complex.

Key missing context includes:

• Trump initially struggled to renounce Duke's endorsement during his first presidential campaign ^[5], suggesting the relationship was politically problematic even for the endorsed candidate
• Duke's Senate run aligned with Trump's campaign themes on immigration and trade ^[6], showing ideological overlap beyond just endorsements
• The shift from endorsing Trump to "trashing" him while endorsing Stein ^[4] demonstrates Duke's willingness to change allegiances based on evolving political positions

Political operatives and media organizations benefit from framing Duke's endorsements as either permanent allegiances or complete rejections, depending on which narrative serves their electoral or ideological interests.

3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement

The original question contains an implicit bias by suggesting Duke has a single, definitive endorsement. This framing oversimplifies a complex pattern of multiple endorsements across different candidates and time periods.

The question's structure implies there is one clear answer, when the evidence shows Duke has strategically endorsed different candidates based on their positions on issues he prioritizes, particularly regarding Israel, immigration, and what he perceives as challenges to white supremacist ideology.

By asking "who" rather than "whom has he endorsed over time," the question misleadingly suggests consistency where the sources demonstrate significant variation in Duke's political endorsements across multiple election cycles and candidates from different parties.