Fact check: What are David Jeremiah's views on the 2025 US presidential election?

1. Summary of the results

Based on the available analyses, David Jeremiah has not publicly stated specific views on the 2025 US presidential election. The sources reveal a pattern of political engagement without explicit endorsements:

• No official endorsements: Jeremiah's team explicitly stated that he has not officially endorsed any candidate, including Donald Trump, and clarified that his prayers for Trump were not an endorsement ^[1].
• Historical political engagement: Jeremiah participated in a 2016 meeting with evangelical leaders and Donald Trump, where he expressed interest in hearing what Trump had to say to religious leaders because he "cares deeply about standing up for Christian values" ^[1].
• Focus on moral foundations: One source indicates Jeremiah previously warned that "the soul of America is at stake" in an election, suggesting his concern for the country's moral foundations and values, though this did not specifically reference the 2025 election ^[2].
• Prophetic perspective: There are references to Jeremiah making statements about prophecy related to Trump's election, with one source mentioning a video titled "David Jeremiah WARNING - Prophecy of STRANGE Things That Will Happen After TRUMP's Election!" though the specific content is not detailed ^[3].

2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints

The analyses reveal several important contextual elements missing from the original question:

• Institutional constraints: The sources highlight the Johnson Amendment, which prohibits churches from openly endorsing political candidates while maintaining tax-exempt status ^{[4] [5]}. This legal framework significantly influences how religious leaders like Jeremiah can publicly engage with electoral politics.
• Evangelical leader dynamics: Jeremiah operates within a broader network of evangelical leaders who have historically engaged with political figures. The 2016 meeting with Trump involved multiple evangelical leaders discussing religious freedoms and Supreme Court appointments ^[4].
• Prophetic ministry focus: Rather than direct political commentary, Jeremiah's approach appears to center on biblical prophecy and its intersection with current events ^[6], which may influence how he frames political discussions.
• Strategic ambiguity: Religious leaders like Jeremiah may benefit from maintaining some distance from explicit political endorsements to preserve their broader ministerial influence across diverse congregations.

3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement

The original question itself does not contain misinformation, as it simply asks about Jeremiah's views. However, the question assumes that Jeremiah has publicly expressed specific views on the 2025 election, which the analyses do not support.

The lack of concrete information about his 2025 election views could lead to:

• Speculation being presented as fact: Without clear statements from Jeremiah, various interpretations of his past political engagement might be incorrectly attributed as his current positions.
• Conflation of past and present positions: His 2016 meeting with Trump and previous statements about America's moral state might be incorrectly extrapolated to represent his 2025 election views.
• Misinterpretation of prophetic content: References to prophetic warnings about Trump's election ^[3] could be mischaracterized as explicit political endorsements rather than theological commentary.

The analyses suggest that any claims about Jeremiah's specific 2025 election views would likely be unsupported by available evidence.