Which party won the December 2, 2025 special election and by what margin?

Checked on December 4, 2025
Disclaimer: Factually can make mistakes. Please verify important information or breaking news. Learn more.

Executive summary

Republican Matt Van Epps won the December 2, 2025 special election for Tennessee’s 7th Congressional District, defeating Democrat Aftyn Behn by roughly 8.8 percentage points — about 53.9% to 45.1% of the vote in early counts reported that night (about 179,000 votes counted) [1]. Major outlets framed the result as a narrow hold for Republicans in a historically deep‑red seat and a warning sign about competitive dynamics ahead of 2026 [2] [3].

1. Republican hold, but closer than expected

Republican Matt Van Epps prevailed in a district long considered safely GOP, capturing victory in the Dec. 2 special election to replace Mark Green — a result widely reported by national outlets including the Associated Press and PBS [2] [4]. Local reporting at the time put Van Epps at 53.9% versus Aftyn Behn’s 45.1% from roughly 179,000 votes, a margin described as “closer‑than‑expected” given the district’s prior partisan lean [1].

2. Why the margin matters: single digits in a ruby‑red district

News organizations emphasized that the single‑digit result alarmed Republicans because Trump carried the district by 22 points in 2024; the special election’s narrow margin signaled a substantial swing toward Democrats compared with 2024 norms [3] [5]. Analysts and outlets framed Van Epps’s win as “averting a Democratic upset” but also as evidence of Democratic overperformance in 2025 special elections more broadly [2] [6].

3. National attention and heavy outside spending

The race drew outsized national attention and money. MAGA Inc. reportedly spent more than $1 million backing Van Epps — its first campaign expenditure since the 2024 presidential cycle — while Democratic organizations poured resources into Behn’s bid, making the special contest an early test of both parties’ operation and turnout strategies [4] [5].

4. Party narratives: triumph and warning signs

Republicans celebrated retention of the seat and described the result as a victory that preserved their map, with party leaders stressing the win’s significance [2] [7]. Democrats treated the close result as proof of momentum, pointing to a pattern in 2025 special elections in which Democrats outperformed 2024 presidential results and improved turnout and persuasion in off‑year contests [8] [3].

5. Ground game and local dynamics explained the closeness

Coverage credited Behn’s aggressive field operation — roughly 70,000 doors canvassed and significant fundraising for a challenger — with narrowing a traditionally large Republican advantage [1]. Reporting also noted that special elections typically favor motivated Democratic bases and that turnout in this contest rivaled the 2022 midterm in the district, amplifying the competitiveness [3] [9].

6. What this means for November 2026

Analysts framed the result as an early indicator for 2026: Republicans avoided a “nightmare,” but the party’s broader electoral picture was described as “scary” given repeated close finishes and Democratic gains in other special contests this year [3] [2]. Both parties will interpret the race as a laboratory for messaging on cost‑of‑living and cultural issues heading into next year [6] [7].

7. Data and reporting caveats

Published vote totals cited here come from contemporaneous news reports and local outlets reporting early counts on election night; some outlets noted that figures were from roughly 179,000 ballots counted by 9:15 p.m. on Dec. 2 [1]. Ballotpedia and major news organizations subsequently logged Van Epps as the winner; detailed certified results were available after initial reporting [10] [11]. Available sources do not mention final certified totals beyond the election‑night figures in the cited reporting [1] [2].

8. Competing perspectives and implicit agendas

Media narratives diverged: outlets emphasizing Republican relief framed the result as “averted disaster,” while others highlighted Democratic momentum and structural concerns for the GOP [2] [3]. Outside spending disclosures and the prominence of Trump’s endorsement suggest vested national interests in a local seat; MAGA Inc.’s rare expenditure signals a strategic priority for the Trump-aligned apparatus [4] [5].

9. Bottom line for readers

The December 2 special election returned a Republican to Congress — Matt Van Epps — by a clear but narrower margin than historical Republican performance in the district, roughly 53.9% to 45.1% in early counts [1]. The win preserved GOP control of the seat but amplified alarms about competitive vulnerabilities heading into the 2026 midterms, a theme underscored across the national reporting cited here [2] [3].

Want to dive deeper?
Which candidates ran in the December 2, 2025 special election and what were their vote totals?
What was the turnout rate for the December 2, 2025 special election compared to previous special elections?
Did the December 2, 2025 special election result change control of the legislative chamber or affect the balance of power?
Were there any recounts, legal challenges, or irregularities reported after the December 2, 2025 special election?
How did key demographics and precincts vote in the December 2, 2025 special election?