Keep Factually independent

Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.

Loading...Time left: ...
Loading...Goal: $500

Fact check: How many States have the Democrat Party gerrymandered?

Checked on August 6, 2025

1. Summary of the results

Based on the analyses provided, Democrats drew redistricting maps in seven states according to multiple sources [1] [2]. The specific states identified include Illinois, Maryland, Oregon, New Mexico, and Nevada [2], with additional mentions of New Jersey [3] and references to California and New York as states where Democrats are planning redistricting efforts [4] [5].

However, the analyses reveal an important distinction: Democratic gerrymandering appears to be less extensive and less effective than Republican efforts. Democrats drew lines affecting 49 districts across seven states, while Republicans drew 177 districts in 19 states [1]. Furthermore, Democratic gerrymanders are described as "far less reliable than those drawn by Republican counterparts," with Democratic advantages often coming in the form of competitive seats rather than safe districts [3].

2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints

The original question lacks crucial context about the comparative scale and effectiveness of gerrymandering by both parties. The analyses show that while Democrats have engaged in gerrymandering, Republican gerrymandering efforts are significantly more extensive, affecting nearly four times as many districts across nearly three times as many states [1].

Additionally, the question doesn't acknowledge the legal and practical constraints that limit gerrymandering efforts. The analyses indicate that both parties face legal hurdles when attempting to redraw districts [5], and that the Supreme Court has addressed partisan gerrymandering claims [1].

Political strategists and party leadership from both parties would benefit from narratives that either minimize their own gerrymandering efforts or maximize the appearance of the opposing party's gerrymandering. Republican leaders benefit from focusing attention on Democratic gerrymandering to deflect from their more extensive efforts, while Democratic leaders benefit from emphasizing the comparative scale of Republican gerrymandering.

3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement

The original question contains potential bias through its singular focus on Democratic gerrymandering without acknowledging that both parties engage in this practice [1]. This framing could mislead readers into believing that gerrymandering is primarily or exclusively a Democratic practice.

The question also lacks important proportional context - while asking specifically about Democratic gerrymandering, it omits the fact that Republican gerrymandering affects significantly more districts and states [1]. This selective framing could contribute to a false equivalency between the two parties' gerrymandering efforts when the data suggests a substantial difference in scale and impact.

The phrasing "How many States have the Democrat Party gerrymandered?" also uses loaded language that assumes intentional manipulation without acknowledging the complex legal and political factors that influence redistricting decisions [1] [5].

Want to dive deeper?
Which states have been accused of gerrymandering by the Democrat Party?
How does gerrymandering impact voting rights in the United States?
What are the key differences between Democrat and Republican gerrymandering strategies?
Can gerrymandering be considered a form of voter suppression?
How have court rulings affected gerrymandering practices in the US since 2020?