Keep Factually independent

Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.

Loading...Goal: 1,000 supporters
Loading...

Which high-profile Democratic elected officials were convicted of child sexual offenses between 2015 and 2025?

Checked on November 5, 2025
Disclaimer: Factually can make mistakes. Please verify important info or breaking news. Learn more.

Executive Summary

Between 2015 and 2025, the evidence provided shows very few high‑profile Democratic elected officials who were actually convicted of child sexual offenses, with Anthony Weiner standing out as a confirmed conviction for sending sexually explicit material to a minor (pleaded guilty and sentenced in 2017). Other names that appear in aggregated lists either relate to earlier convictions, allegations, resignations without conviction, or cases that lack clear final adjudication within the 2015–2025 window, so the correct answer for that decade is narrowly constrained by available, verifiable convictions [1] [2] [3].

1. Why Anthony Weiner is the clearest documented conviction in the period — and what that conviction covered

Anthony Weiner, a former Democratic congressman, pleaded guilty to a federal charge for sending explicit images to a minor; he was sentenced in 2017 and required to register as a sex offender. This case is consistently listed in summaries of political sex crimes and in compilations of elected officials convicted of such offenses, and it fits squarely within the 2015–2025 timeframe as a final conviction and sentence [1] [2]. Several aggregated lists and reviews cite Weiner as a high‑profile Democratic example of a conviction involving a minor; these sources treat his 2017 plea and sentence as an established fact, distinguishing it from allegations or resignations without conviction.

2. Cases that look similar but do not meet “convicted between 2015–2025” criteria

Multiple entries in the provided materials reference Democratic politicians tied to sex‑abuse allegations, resignations, or historical admissions, but they do not document convictions within 2015–2025. Ed Murray’s resignation after multiple accusations and Neil Goldschmidt’s historical admission of abuse are cited in lists, yet those items either predate 2015 or lack a new conviction during the decade in question [2] [3]. Likewise, Cecil Brockman’s 2025 arrest and subsequent calls to resign were widely reported as charges and a resignation sequence, not a conviction, in the materials supplied [4] [5].

3. Problems with aggregated lists: mixing allegations, past convictions, and party labels

The supplied datasets include crowd‑compiled lists that mix different legal outcomes — arrests, plea deals, admissions, historical misconduct, and convictions — and sometimes conflate party identification with actions. Several sources explicitly warn that such lists are not exhaustive and require verification; they compile names across long periods without consistently flagging whether the item is an allegation, an indictment, a plea, or a conviction [2]. That blending leads to overstated impressions if the reader assumes all named individuals were convicted within 2015–2025; the materials themselves show that many high‑profile entries fall outside the strict timeframe or lack conviction.

4. Republican cases and non‑party context that clarify comparative framing

The materials also reference well‑known Republican cases (for example, Dennis Hastert’s guilty plea on bank‑structuring charges tied to concealing past sexual misconduct) to illustrate that serious sex‑related criminality has affected politicians across parties, but those cases often involve distinct charges (financial crimes, admissions about past wrongdoing) rather than direct child‑sex convictions in the 2015–2025 window [6] [1]. Using those Republican examples in comparative lists can create an impression of parity, but the precise legal outcomes and timelines differ, reinforcing the need for granular, case‑by‑case verification rather than party‑level generalizations.

5. Bottom line: what the available evidence supports and what remains uncertain

Based on the supplied sources, the only high‑profile Democratic elected official clearly convicted of a child‑related sexual offense within 2015–2025 is Anthony Weiner (plea and sentence in 2017). Other names that appear in lists are either tied to convictions outside the decade, indictments or arrests without conviction, or public allegations that resulted in resignations or ongoing investigations [1] [4] [2]. The compiled sources caution that crowd lists may overclaim and recommend further verification for each name; given that caveat, any broader claim that multiple high‑profile Democrats were convicted of child sexual offenses during 2015–2025 is not supported by the documentation provided [2] [3].

Want to dive deeper?
Which Democratic elected officials were convicted of child sexual offenses between 2015 and 2025?
Was Anthony Weiner convicted of child sexual offenses or adult sexting crimes and when?
What was Eric Schneiderman accused of in 2018 and were there criminal convictions?
Were any state or local Democratic officials convicted of child sexual abuse between 2015 and 2025?
How do media and legal definitions distinguish child sexual offenses from consensual sexting in prosecutions?