Fact check: What are examples of democratic-led states that have redistricted congressional maps in the past decade?

1. Summary of the results

Based on the analyses provided, several Democratic-led states have engaged in or planned congressional redistricting efforts in the past decade:

• California: Governor Gavin Newsom is leading a redistricting initiative that could give Democrats an advantage in five newly drawn districts ^[1]. Newsom is planning to bring this redistricting fight directly to voters in a special election on November 4, potentially helping Democrats pick up five additional U.S. House seats ^[2]. California Democratic lawmakers could advance new congressional maps in just three days to offset Republican redistricting efforts in Texas ^[3].
• Illinois: This Democratic-majority state has been accused of gerrymandering, with its current map containing non-compact districts that lead to unequal voter density per area ^[4]. Governor JB Pritzker continues to leave the door open to redistricting the state's congressional map, though finding another Democratic seat in Illinois presents challenges ^[2].
• New York, New Jersey, New Hampshire, and Maryland: These Democrat-led states are prepared to launch countermeasures to Texas redistricting plans ^[5].

2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints

The original question lacks important context about the reactive nature of many Democratic redistricting efforts. The analyses reveal that several Democratic states are responding specifically to Texas redistricting actions, rather than initiating redistricting independently ^{[1] [6] [5]}.

The question also omits the strategic timing involved - California's redistricting is being fast-tracked with the potential for completion in just three days, and Newsom is using a special election mechanism to bypass normal legislative processes ^{[2] [3]}.

Political beneficiaries of these redistricting efforts include:

• Democratic governors like Gavin Newsom and JB Pritzker, who gain political capital by appearing to fight for their party's interests
• Democratic Party leadership nationally, who could gain up to five additional House seats from California alone
• Redistricting consultants and legal firms who profit from the complex legal and technical work involved in redrawing maps

3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement

The original question appears neutral in its framing, simply asking for factual examples. However, it could be interpreted as seeking ammunition for partisan arguments about Democratic gerrymandering without acknowledging the retaliatory context revealed in the analyses.

The question's focus on "the past decade" may be misleading, as the analyses primarily discuss current and planned redistricting efforts rather than completed redistricting from earlier in the decade ^{[1] [2]}. This timing distinction is crucial because it shows these are largely reactive measures to recent Republican redistricting efforts, particularly in Texas.

The framing also omits that some of these efforts, particularly California's, are being positioned as defensive countermeasures rather than aggressive gerrymandering initiatives ^[5].