Keep Factually independent

Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.

Loading...Goal: 1,000 supporters
Loading...

Fact check: Has any Democrat in office called trump "hitler"?

Checked on September 16, 2025

1. Summary of the results

The original statement inquires about whether any Democrat in office has called Trump "Hitler". Based on the analyses provided, there is evidence to suggest that some Democrats have made comparisons between Trump and Hitler, but the direct quote of a Democrat in office calling Trump "Hitler" is not consistently found across all sources. Specifically, Rep. Jasmine Crockett is quoted defending her comparison of Trump to a 'wannabe Hitler' [1]. Other sources mention Democrats comparing the Trump administration to Nazi Germany or criticizing the use of Nazi-themed rhetoric by Trump, such as Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz comparing ICE to the Gestapo [2], and Biden criticizing Trump for using 'Hitler's language' [3]. However, these comparisons do not necessarily equate to directly calling Trump "Hitler".

2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints

A key missing context in the original statement is the nuance of the comparisons being made. The analyses show that while some Democrats have drawn parallels between Trump's actions or rhetoric and those of Hitler or the Nazi regime, these comparisons are often made to criticize authoritarian tendencies or specific policies rather than to directly equate Trump with Hitler [4] [5]. Alternative viewpoints, such as those presented by Sen. John Fetterman, who criticizes the Democratic Party for repeatedly making these comparisons, indicate that not all Democrats agree with this strategy [1]. Additionally, the analyses highlight the controversy and potential backlash of making such comparisons, suggesting that the issue is more complex than a simple yes or no answer to the original question [4] [5].

3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement

The original statement may be misleading because it implies a direct and explicit comparison that may not be entirely accurate or representative of the views of all Democrats in office. The analyses suggest that while comparisons have been made, they are often part of a broader critique of Trump's policies or rhetoric and may not be as straightforward as the statement suggests [4] [3]. Bias may also be present in how the question is framed, as it could be interpreted as an attempt to sensationalize or criticize Democrats without considering the full context of the comparisons being made. The sources themselves may also have bias, with some appearing to criticize Democrats for making these comparisons [1], and others focusing more on the implications of Trump's rhetoric and actions without directly addressing the question [6] [7]. Overall, the potential for misinformation or bias in the original statement underscores the importance of considering multiple sources and contexts when evaluating political discourse [4] [5] [8].

Want to dive deeper?
Which Democratic lawmakers have made public comparisons between Trump and Hitler?
How has Trump responded to being compared to Hitler by Democratic officials?
What historical context is used to compare Trump's policies to those of Hitler's regime?
Have any Republican politicians criticized Trump for actions reminiscent of authoritarian regimes?
How do fact-checking organizations evaluate claims of Trump's policies being similar to Hitler's?