List of democrats who voted to fund ice
Executive summary
Seven House Democrats broke with most of their party to vote for the Department of Homeland Security spending bill — a measure that keeps ICE funding roughly flat and includes about $10 billion for immigration-and-customs-enforcement">Immigration and Customs Enforcement — a decision that drew immediate rebuke from Democratic leaders and progressive groups [1] [2] [3].
1. The simple list: who voted to fund ICE
The seven House Democrats who voted with Republicans to pass the DHS funding bill are Don Davis (NC), Tom Suozzi (NY), Henry Cuellar (TX), Vicente Gonzalez (TX), Laura Gillen (NY), Marie Gluesenkamp Perez (WA), and Jared Golden (ME), according to multiple outlets that tracked the roll call [4] [5] [3].
2. What they voted for: the bill’s ICE provisions and context
The DHS appropriations measure they supported funds the department at roughly $64.4 billion overall and preserves about $10 billion for ICE while including several modest reforms — reductions in some detention-bed funding, cuts to Border Patrol requests, and $20 million for ICE body cameras among other oversight tweaks — changes Democratic critics called insufficient [1] [6] [2].
3. Why these Democrats said yes: district pressure and shutdown risk
Supporters cited the political realities of a Republican-controlled House and the practical costs of a shutdown — arguing that failing to pass DHS funding could harm TSA, FEMA and the Coast Guard — and that the bill’s narrow reforms were preferable to no funding at all, a line pushed by some Democrats and echoed in reporting [2] [1] [7].
4. The backlash: party leaders and progressive critics
House Democratic leaders including Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries and prominent progressives vocally opposed the bill, calling ICE “out of control” after high-profile operations and the fatal shooting of Renee Good in Minneapolis; many Democrats — roughly 206 in the House vote — voted against the bill to register that opposition [7] [3] [8].
5. How outlets framed the seven votes and partisan narratives
Mainstream outlets consistently reported “seven Democrats” voted for the measure and published the same roster of names; progressive outlets characterized the votes as betrayal or capitulation to GOP priorities, while outlets like TIME and The Washington Post framed some Democratic yes votes as pragmatic choices to avert a shutdown and preserve leverage elsewhere [9] [2] [10].
6. What’s not settled in reporting: individual motivations and consequences
While sources list the seven lawmakers and quote general rationales — district pressure, avoidance of a shutdown, belief the bill contained modest guardrails — reporting does not fully document each member’s private deliberations or electoral calculations beyond public statements and past voting patterns, so definitive motives for each individual remain sourced to their public comments and local press [5] [1].
7. Political stakes going forward: Senate, oversight and public reaction
The House vote sends the package to the Senate, where Democrats face choices about amendments and whether to use the larger appropriations process to press for stronger ICE constraints; progressive groups and civil liberties advocates have signaled they will press the Senate and the public to demand more accountability if federal enforcement continues its recent tactics [2] [11] [12].
8. Bottom line: a short list with long consequences
The factual answer is straightforward — Don Davis, Tom Suozzi, Henry Cuellar, Vicente Gonzalez, Laura Gillen, Marie Gluesenkamp Perez and Jared Golden voted to fund the DHS bill that maintains ICE funding — but that roll call is only the opening of a broader political fight over oversight, public backlash, and how Democrats balance governing realities with demands from their left flank [4] [3] [7].