Which Democrats voted ‘yes’ on H.R. 7006 according to the House roll call, and which of them represent districts with large pro‑Palestinian constituencies?
Executive summary
One authoritative roll call shows the House passed H.R. 7006 341–79 on January 14, 2026, and outside reporting tallied that 153 House Democrats voted “Yes” on the measure (341 total Yeas) [1] [2] [3]. The official House clerk maintains the roll call record with the full member-by‑member vote that identifies every individual Democrat who voted yea [4] [5]; the public record needed to match names to district-level constituency characteristics is available on that clerk page but the provided sources do not include the printed list of individual names in snippets here [4] [5].
1. What the roll call shows: vote totals and the Democratic yes count
The House roll call for H.R. 7006 (Roll Call 28) records a final passage vote of 341 to 79 and is published on the Clerk’s roll call site and in House records for the 119th Congress, 2nd Session [4] [5] [2]; independent summaries from the House Appropriations Republican press release and members’ offices repeat the 341–79 outcome [1] [2]. Advocacy reporting and aggregation by Qasim Rashid reported that 153 Democrats voted in favor of the package — a figure presented as a summary count of Democratic Yeas [3]. The official vote roster that lists each member’s recorded vote is available on the Clerk’s Roll Call page for Roll No. 28 [4] [5].
2. Which Democrats voted “Yes”: where to find the names and what the sources show
The precise list of Democrat members who voted yes is in the official roll call text on the Clerk of the House site for Roll Call 28; the Clerk’s page is the primary source for every member’s yea‑and‑nay entry and should be consulted to extract names district-by-district [4] [5]. The excerpts and summaries in the supplied reporting confirm the roll call exists and that 153 Democrats are reported as having voted yes, but the supplied snippets do not print the full name-by-name roster within the materials provided here, so this analysis cannot responsibly reproduce or enumerate every individual Democrat beyond citing the aggregate counts from the sources [3] [4].
3. Which of those Democrats represent districts with large pro‑Palestinian constituencies — limits of the available reporting
Determining which of the 153 Democratic Yeas represent districts with “large pro‑Palestinian constituencies” requires at least two datasets not contained in the supplied snippets: the clerk’s member vote roster and independent measures that define and quantify “pro‑Palestinian constituencies” (for example, protest activity, constituent petitions, precinct-level polling, or demographic/organizational strength). The supplied sources do not include district‑level protest or opinion data and do not map votes to measures of constituency activism or sentiment, so this report cannot authoritatively name which yes‑voting Democrats represent such districts based on the provided material [4] [5] [3].
4. Competing narratives and implicit agendas in the coverage
Advocacy coverage frames the Democratic yes votes as an endorsement of specific controversial policy elements in the bill — including restrictions on abortion funding, contraception conscience carveouts, expedited military financing to Israel, and language limiting U.S. support for Palestinian political pathways — and uses the 153 figure to press accountability on those members [3]. Congressional Republican statements present H.R. 7006 as a routine appropriations package delivering targeted investments and national security support, repeating the 341–79 passage and emphasizing funding priorities [1]. The tension between those narratives reflects competing agendas: advocacy actors seek to tie votes to specific foreign‑policy and social policy outcomes, while congressional Republicans emphasize procedural and fiscal rationales [3] [1].
5. What an accurate follow‑up requires and recommended next steps for verification
To move from aggregate counts to the granular answer requested — an exact list of the Democrats who voted yes and which of them represent districts with demonstrably large pro‑Palestinian constituencies — one must (A) extract the member‑by‑member yes votes from the Clerk’s Roll Call No. 28 page, and (B) cross‑reference those names with independent, cited measures of constituency activism or opinion (local protest records, polling, petition volumes, or constituency demographics). The Clerk’s roll call is the primary source for part A and is cited here [4] [5]; the present packet of sources lacks the constituency metrics needed for part B, so any further naming or mapping would require additional, cited local or polling sources that are not included in the materials provided [4] [5] [3].