What demographic groups are most likely included in the 33% for Trump and 32% for Harris?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
Exit polls and post‑election surveys show the blocs behind the roughly one‑third support figures — about 33% for Trump and 32% for Harris in some polls — reflect clear demographic splits: Trump’s strength came from noncollege voters, white voters, rural residents and older men, while Harris’s support concentrated among college‑educated, urban, younger and many Black, Asian and Hispanic voters [1] [2] [3]. Multiple datasets also show gender, education and race remain the dominant axes of difference: Trump led among noncollege and rural voters; Harris led among voters with four‑year degrees and urban residents [1] [2].
1. Who’s likely in the “33% for Trump” slice: the noncollege, rural and older coalition
Polling and post‑election analysis indicate Trump’s roughly one‑third pockets of support disproportionately include voters without four‑year college degrees and those living in rural areas; Pew reports Trump’s margin among noncollege voters was 56% to 42% and he won rural voters by about 40 points (69%–29%) [1]. Exit‑poll derived coverage and other surveys also show Trump’s gains among middle‑age and older voters and among white voters generally, reinforcing that a 33% share in a snapshot poll is likely to contain a larger share of noncollege white and rural voters [1] [2].
2. Who’s likely in the “32% for Harris” slice: college‑educated, urban and younger voters
Pew and related analyses show Harris performed best with voters holding at least four‑year college degrees and urban residents, where she won by “wide margins” and carried college‑educated voters roughly 57% to 41% [2] [1]. Younger voters (especially under 30) were more likely to back Harris in several exit‑poll reports, and urban, college‑educated profiles are disproportionately represented in many polls where Harris sits near a third of support [4] [2].
3. Race and ethnicity: more nuance than a simple two‑party split
Racial composition of each candidate’s base shifted in 2024. Pew found Trump’s voter coalition grew more racially diverse than in prior cycles — Hispanic, Black and Asian shares of his voters rose (Hispanics up to about 10% of his voters) — even though Harris’s coalition still included majorities of non‑Hispanic White voters in some analyses [3] [1]. Other surveys and exit polls show Black voters still overwhelmingly supported Harris (large majorities), while Hispanic and Asian voters were more divided — Hispanics narrowly favored Harris in some sources but were far less monolithic than in 2020 [5] [2] [4].
4. The gender and age layers: who tilts the balance
Gender gaps remained important: many exit‑poll summaries show men were likelier to back Trump while women leaned toward Harris, with Trump stronger among white men and Harris stronger among many women and younger voters [6] [4]. Age patterns show voters under 50 leaned toward Harris while older voters favored Trump, so a poll snapshot with ~32–33% for each could mask concentration of younger/college‑educated voters on Harris and older/noncollege voters on Trump [7] [4].
5. How question wording and sample frame change who’s counted in those percentages
A reported 33% or 32% figure depends on whether a poll samples registered voters, likely voters, or all adults; whether it weights for education, race and turnout; and on timing. Harvard CAPS/Harris and other monthly polls can show different headline shares than exit polls or Pew’s post‑election tabulations because of differences in methodology and timing [8] [9] [1]. Available sources do not mention the exact poll that produced the 33%/32% numbers in your query, so precise composition of those groups in that specific poll is not reported in the materials provided.
6. Competing interpretations and political consequence
Analysts differ about what these coalitions mean: one view sees Trump’s gains among Hispanic, Black and Asian voters as evidence of a broader, lasting Republican inroad [3] [10]. Another view — noted by researchers — cautions that the GOP’s gains were concentrated among particular subgroups (e.g., noncollege or specific cohorts of Latino men) and that Democrats kept dominant margins among Black voters and in many college‑educated urban constituencies [2] [5]. These differing framings reflect different implicit agendas: narratives stressing GOP diversification support Republican messaging about broadening appeal, while cautions about fragility serve Democratic strategists emphasizing turnout and coalition rebuilding [3] [5].
Limitations: these conclusions summarize patterns reported by Pew, PRRI, exit‑poll coverage and related outlets; the exact makeup of a particular “33% for Trump / 32% for Harris” poll is not given in the sources provided, so finer details for that specific figure are not found in current reporting [1] [5].