Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
Fact check: How did deportations change during Donald Trump's presidency 2017-2020?
Executive summary
The data and reporting show deportations rose sharply in the early Trump period [1] compared with 2016, but overall removals declined by 2020 as enforcement tactics, legal challenges, pandemic disruptions, and changing migration flows reshaped outcomes. Key claims about “millions removed” or a sustained mass-deportation surge are partly true for arrests and interior enforcement policy changes but overstated when applied to total annual removals across 2017–2020 [2] [3] [4].
1. The claim of a mass removal surge — what the records actually say
Government enforcement reports show a pronounced uptick in interior arrests and removals in FY2017: ICE reported 143,470 administrative arrests (a 30 percent increase over FY2016) and 226,119 removals in fiscal year 2017, reflecting a deliberate policy shift away from prior enforcement priorities toward broader targeting of removable noncitizens [2]. Outside reporting contemporaneously described the administration’s intent to dramatically expand removals and use tools such as expedited removal; coverage in the early Trump months predicted high annual removal totals but noted practical obstacles [5] [4]. These sources confirm the administration changed the enforcement posture and produced higher arrest activity in 2017, even as they caution that long-term, sustained annual removal totals did not reach some public aims.
2. Contradictory figures and overstated media claims — parsing the “2 million out” assertion
Some accounts circulated claims that the Trump administration achieved “over 2 million illegal aliens out” in a short period; however, that figure mixes self-deportations, voluntary departures, and administrative removals and is not directly comparable to official FY removals tallies [6]. Independent summaries and ICE archival statistics show FY2020 removals of 185,884 and an administrative-arrest decline from 2019 to 2020, indicating a 30 percent drop in removals between FY2019 and FY2020 [3]. Therefore, while interior enforcement expanded and many noncitizens were induced or compelled to leave, the headline “2 million removed” lacks the consistent definitional basis to stand as a direct measure of formal deportations during 2017–2020 [6] [3].
3. Policy shifts explain arrest rises but not a monotonic rise in removals through 2020
Advocacy and policy analyses documented a deliberate abandonment of narrowly targeted enforcement priorities in 2017, with ICE instructed to pursue a wider pool of removable people, including those without criminal records; that produced a 42 percent increase in ICE arrests between January 25, 2017 and the end of FY2017 in some counts [4]. Yet enforcement capacity, legal restraints, and administrative hurdles limited the ability to convert every arrest into a removal. By FY2020 ICE recorded fewer removals than in FY2019, reflecting operational constraints, policy pushback, and later external factors like COVID-19 that reduced deportation flights and asylum processing [3] [5]. The net effect: policy radicalization in enforcement, but mixed quantitative results across the 2017–2020 span.
4. Divergent sources reflect different emphases and potential agendas
Government ICE statistics emphasize operational counts (arrests, detentions, removals) and show the year-to-year numeric shifts; advocacy groups and news outlets highlight policy intent, human impact, and broader counts including voluntary departures. The article asserting “over 2 million out” places emphasis on both self-deportations and formal removals, which inflates comparability with ICE’s removals metric [6]. Migration-policy analysis and the American Immigration Council focus on the administrative pivot away from prioritization, flagging the political agenda to expand removals while noting practical shortfalls in achieving mass-deportation targets [5] [4]. Readers should treat differences in definitions and institutional motives as central to reconciling conflicting claims.
5. Bottom-line comparison and what is reliably known
Putting the pieces together: the Trump administration’s early years saw a clear rise in ICE arrests and a policy-driven expansion of who was targeted for removal in 2017, backed by ICE reporting of increased administrative arrests and removals [2] [4]. However, total formal removals fell by FY2020 compared with FY2019, and large-sounding totals that blend voluntary departures with removals are not directly comparable to ICE removal figures [3] [6]. The most defensible summary is that enforcement intensity and scope increased, producing more arrests and removals in 2017, but the narrative of continuous, escalating mass deportations through 2020 is not supported by the official year-by-year removal data [2] [3] [5].