Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
Fact check: The Department of Homeland Security funded Take This just to put out a document demanding that companies denounce "Gamergate 2". What kind of Orwellian bullshit is this?
1. Summary of the results
The Department of Homeland Security has indeed funded Take This through a grant of approximately $700,000 [1], but the characterization of their work in the original statement requires important context. The funding is part of a broader research project titled "Disrupting Video Games-Based Radicalization Through Collaborative Cross-Sector Networks" [2]. While Take This has called for developers to denounce what they term "Gamergate 2" in relation to Sweet Baby Inc. [2], this appears to be separate from the main objectives of the DHS-funded research.
2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints
The original statement omits several crucial aspects of the project:
- The research aims to develop frameworks for understanding extremism in games [2]
- The project involves creating toolboxes for trust and safety, game designers, and public/legislative efforts [3]
- Researchers acknowledge limited existing research in this area and are working to help gaming companies become more proactive in content moderation [4]
- The project focuses specifically on identifying and preventing white nationalist and extremist activities within online gaming communities [5]
3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement
The original statement contains several misleading elements:
- It suggests that the sole purpose of the funding was to "demand" companies denounce "Gamergate 2," which is inaccurate [4]
- It characterizes the initiative as "Orwellian," when in fact it's a research project aimed at developing best practices and resources for monitoring extremist activities [4] [3]
- It oversimplifies a complex research initiative that involves multiple organizations and objectives [3]
Different stakeholders have varying interests in how this initiative is perceived:
- Gaming companies benefit from portraying this as government overreach to avoid additional moderation responsibilities
- Government agencies benefit from presenting it as a necessary security measure
- Research organizations like Take This benefit financially from the grants and increased influence in the gaming industry [1]