Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
Did America comitt any crimes in Mexico
Executive Summary
The question "Did America commit any crimes in Mexico?" has a layered answer: yes, historical and documented actions by U.S. forces and citizens involved violence and interventions on Mexican soil that scholars, historians, and contemporary reporting characterize as unlawful or criminal under modern norms, while recent reporting also highlights individual Americans committing crimes within Mexico. The evidence spans three eras—19th‑century war and territorial conquest, early 20th‑century military interventions during the Mexican Revolution, and 21st‑century cross‑border criminal activity—each supported by analysis and reporting in the provided sources. Together these sources show both state actions that violated Mexican sovereignty and instances of American citizens participating in cartel‑related crimes, while alternative interpretations emphasize complexity, differing legal standards of the time, and the limits of attributing state criminality versus misconduct by individuals [1] [2] [3] [4].
1. Long Memory: Territory, War Crimes, and the Mexican‑American War that Redrew a Continent
The Mexican‑American War (1846–1848) resulted in the United States acquiring vast territories from Mexico and produced credible contemporary and later allegations of atrocities by American forces, including civilian killings, rape, looting, and indiscriminate bombardment—conduct historians and some legal scholars treat as meeting the modern definition of war crimes. Sources document large casualty figures, territorial cession for $15 million, and primary‑source accounts of U.S. troops committing violence against Mexican civilians and combatants; scholars note that racist attitudes and anti‑Catholic sentiment among U.S. forces helped dehumanize the Mexican population and enabled extreme violence [1] [2] [5]. These facts show the U.S. as an actor whose wartime conduct inflicted severe harms and raises questions about accountability by contemporary standards.
2. Intervention and Occupation: Veracruz, Punitive Expeditions, and Sovereignty Violations
During the Mexican Revolution era, the United States repeatedly intervened in Mexico’s internal conflicts through military occupation and punitive expeditions—most notably the 1914 Veracruz occupation and the 1916–17 expedition against Pancho Villa—operations that involved force on Mexican soil, civilian casualties, and infringements on Mexico’s sovereignty. Documentary analyses describe the Veracruz occupation lasting months and the cross‑border expedition creating diplomatic and human costs, framing these interventions as actions that many historians view as violations of Mexican sovereignty and the kinds of conduct that international law would deem unlawful today. Contemporaneous and retrospective accounts treat these as examples of U.S. actions in Mexico that exceeded mere diplomacy and entered the realm of coercive military conduct [6] [3] [7].
3. Modern Cross‑Border Crime: Americans as Perpetrators and Victims in Mexico
Contemporary reporting shows a sharp rise in arrests of U.S. citizens for cartel‑related offenses and documents Americans being recruited by or victimized by Mexican organized crime. The Guardian reported a 457% increase in arrests for organized‑crime related offenses during the presidency of Andrés Manuel López Obrador, noting Americans smuggling drugs and weapons, being indebted to cartels, and also being targeted—with hundreds missing or murdered between 2022 and 2023 (published 2025‑02‑11). This paints a two‑way picture: Americans sometimes commit crimes in Mexico as participants in criminal networks, and they also suffer violence as victims of those same networks [4].
4. Comparative Data and Limits of Attribution: Crime Statistics Versus State Responsibility
Comparative crime datasets and overviews emphasize that Mexico faces high levels of violence and that cross‑border flows—particularly of firearms and illicit drugs—create shared criminal dynamics; however, such datasets do not, by themselves, prove U.S. state criminality on Mexican soil. Analytical sources that compare crime rates in Mexico and the U.S. stress border‑related crime and trafficking but do not document direct acts by the U.S. government committing crimes within Mexico in the contemporary period. The distinction matters legally and analytically: violations by individual Americans or illicit flows originating in the U.S. are different from state conduct such as invasions or occupations [8] [9].
5. Synthesis and Competing Interpretations: What the Evidence Shows and What It Leaves Open
Taken together, the provided analyses establish three settled points: the U.S. engaged in military actions in Mexico in the 19th and early 20th centuries that produced civilian harm and sovereignty violations consistent with unlawful conduct (and which some historians label crimes), modern reporting documents Americans committing cartel‑linked crimes inside Mexico and being victimized there, and comparative crime sources highlight border dynamics without attributing contemporary state criminality to the United States. Interpretive differences arise over terminology—whether to call historical interventions "crimes" under the norms of their time versus modern international law—and over assigning responsibility for cross‑border harms to state policy versus nonstate criminal networks [1] [3] [4]. These tensions explain why answers vary by era, legal framework, and the specific actors under scrutiny.