Did the Biden admin put a bounty on Maduro

Checked on January 14, 2026
Disclaimer: Factually can make mistakes. Please verify important information or breaking news. Learn more.

Executive summary

Yes — the Biden administration officially increased a U.S. reward for information leading to the arrest of Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro to $25 million in January 2025, a move reported by major outlets as part of U.S. pressure on Maduro after a disputed third term; that action built on an earlier $15 million reward from 2020 (Trump) and was characterized by U.S. officials as largely symbolic [1] [2] [3] [4].

1. What happened: a concrete increase in the reward, not a secret “bounty” scheme

On Jan. 10, 2025 the Biden administration announced it was offering $25 million for information leading to Maduro’s arrest, an increase from a $15 million reward set under the Trump administration in 2020; the New York Times and the BBC both reported the $25 million figure and described it as an escalation of U.S. pressure after Maduro’s contested third term [1] [2], while fact-checkers catalogued the timeline showing the reward’s origins in 2020 and the January 2025 increase [4].

2. Legal and rhetorical framing: “reward” versus “bounty” and the symbolic intent

U.S. officials framed the announcement as a reward for information tied to criminal charges and as a message of solidarity with Venezuelan opposition, with National Security Council and State Department spokespeople linking the move to diplomatic pressure rather than an explicit promise of capture operations; major coverage noted such rewards are often symbolic and meant to amplify international efforts and pressure on a foreign leader [1] [3].

3. Continuity from prior administrations and the role of indictments

The $25 million update did not create new underlying criminal charges; the DOJ’s indictments dated back to 2020 and had been kept in place through the Biden term, so the reward represented a higher tip for existing legal cases rather than a fresh unilateral U.S. declaration of extrajudicial capture [5] [3] [4].

4. How the fact has been used politically and in media narratives

Political actors and partisan outlets immediately invoked the reward in competing narratives: critics of Biden accused his team of hypocrisy for not “enforcing” the reward, while supporters emphasized legal process and diplomacy; conservative commentators and Republican officials repeatedly cited the $25 million figure to argue the administration had pursued Maduro in other ways, and outlets ranging from The Gateway Pundit to Senate statements amplified the number in partisan contexts [6] [7] [8].

5. Post-Biden developments and evolving reward amounts

Subsequent reporting documented further changes after the Biden term: by August 2025 the U.S. reportedly raised the reward again to $50 million under later U.S. action, a development noted in public legal summaries and press reporting that doubled the earlier $25 million figure — underscoring that reward levels have shifted over time and are tied to policy choices by successive administrations [3].

6. Bottom line and remaining caveats

The clear, documentable fact is that the Biden administration publicly increased the U.S. reward for information leading to Maduro’s arrest to $25 million in January 2025; whether one calls that a “bounty” depends on semantics and political framing, and reporting at the time stressed the move’s symbolic and diplomatic intent rather than an operational capture effort [1] [2] [4]. This account rests on contemporary mainstream reporting and public statements; if further classified actions or internal deliberations are at issue, those are not established in the cited public sources [1] [3].

Want to dive deeper?
How do U.S. State Department/DOJ rewards for foreign fugitives work and how often are they changed?
What were the legal indictments and charges against Nicolás Maduro filed by the U.S. Department of Justice?
How have foreign governments and international organizations reacted to U.S. reward announcements for Venezuelan officials?