Did Biden call Americans garbage?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
President Biden told a Voto Latino Zoom call that “the only garbage I see floating out there is his supporters — his — his demonization of Latinos is unconscionable, and it’s un-American,” a line that many listeners heard as calling Trump supporters “garbage” and which the White House later sought to clarify as referring to a specific speaker’s rhetoric [1] [2]. Multiple outlets report the administration edited the released transcript to suggest Biden meant “supporter’s” (singular) or the comedian’s remarks, sparking GOP accusations and an oversight letter alleging a possible records violation [3] [4].
1. What Biden said, as captured by journalists and stenographers
Video and stenographer transcripts quote Biden saying “The only garbage I see floating out there is his supporters — his — his demonization of Latinos is unconscionable, and it’s un-American,” phrased in a way that many interpreted as an insult directed at Trump’s supporters [1] [5]. News organizations including AP, Reuters and NPR reported those words from the official stenographic record and from the clip circulating after the call [1] [6] [2].
2. White House response and transcript edits
The White House quickly posted a transcript that inserted an apostrophe to make the word “supporter’s,” suggesting Biden was referring to a single person (the comedian) and then clarified publicly that he meant the “hateful rhetoric” spewed by that speaker — not all Trump supporters [3] [1] [7]. AP reporting and follow-ups found that White House staff altered the record despite concerns from official stenographers, raising questions about why the transcript was changed [1].
3. Political fallout and how both sides framed it
Republicans treated the remark as definitive evidence Biden “called Americans garbage,” using it for fundraising and outrage messaging; House Republicans later demanded preservation of documents and a corrected transcript under the Presidential Records Act [4] [8]. The Trump campaign and allies amplified the interpretation that Biden insulted tens of millions of Americans, while Democrats and the White House emphasized Biden’s subsequent clarification that he was condemning the comedian’s racist rhetoric [8] [7].
4. Media assessments and disagreement over intent
News analysis differed on whether this was a gaffe, a slip of phrasing, or a substantive insult. Time said Biden “sounded as if he was calling Trump’s supporters ‘garbage’” even as the White House’s crisis transcript tried to attribute the word to the rhetoric rather than people [3]. Other outlets tracked Biden’s own clarification on X and noted ambiguity in the live delivery, reflecting genuine disagreement in reporting about the intended object of the word “garbage” [2] [7].
5. Evidence limits and why the dispute persisted
Available reporting documents the stenographer’s original transcript and the White House’s edited version, but public sources here do not conclusively resolve whether Biden’s audible words were meant to target supporters broadly or a speaker’s rhetoric specifically; the administration’s edits and rapid clarification created historical ambiguity that both parties exploited [1] [3]. Assertions that Biden “called Americans garbage” rest on how listeners parsed a halting sentence on a closed Zoom call and on whether the corrected transcript accurately reflected the speaker’s intent [5] [6].
6. Broader context and rhetorical stakes
This episode occurred days after a comedian at a Trump rally insulted Puerto Rico, which Biden cited; he framed his comment as condemning that racist joke’s rhetoric [7]. The row fed into larger campaign dynamics — Republicans used it to mobilize voters and raise money, Democrats stressed the original target was hateful rhetoric — demonstrating how contested clips and transcript edits can become political flashpoints regardless of speaker intent [8] [9].
Limitations: available sources do not include the raw audio waveform analysis or an official bipartisan adjudication of whether the edited transcript violated the Presidential Records Act beyond the GOP complaint [4] [1]. Sources here document the words as reported, the White House’s clarification, the transcript alteration and the political reactions; they do not settle the question of Biden’s private intent beyond his public clarification [1] [7].