Keep Factually independent

Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.

Loading...Goal: 1,000 supporters
Loading...

Did Donald Trump ever refer to himself as king?

Checked on November 15, 2025
Disclaimer: Factually can make mistakes. Please verify important info or breaking news. Learn more.

Executive summary

Donald Trump has publicly referred to himself as “king” in multiple social-media posts and has shared AI imagery and videos that depict him wearing a crown or labeled “King Trump,” prompting widespread backlash and protests labeled “No Kings.” Major outlets report he posted “LONG LIVE THE KING” after the DOT move on congestion pricing and circulated AI clips showing him as a crowned pilot or monarch — coverage includes People, The Guardian, The Independent and Sky News [1] [2] [3] [4].

1. What he actually said and posted: a direct record

Reporting shows at least one explicit self-reference: on Truth Social Trump wrote “CONGESTION PRICING IS DEAD. Manhattan, and all of New York, is SAVED. LONG LIVE THE KING!” after the Department of Transportation rescinded approval for New York City’s congestion pricing, a post widely quoted by The Guardian and local outlets [2] [5]. In addition to text, Trump and/or his accounts shared AI-generated imagery and videos depicting him crowned or in a “KING TRUMP” jet — People, The Independent and Sky News document those posts [1] [6] [4].

2. Visuals and AI content: embracing the “king” persona

Beyond words, Trump amplified the “king” motif through visuals. The White House Instagram shared a doctored Time-style cover showing him crowned, and Trump posted AI videos showing himself as a king in a fighter jet dumping brown liquid on “No Kings” protesters; outlets including People, Variety, Sky News and The Independent reported and described these AI clips [1] [7] [4] [6].

3. Political context: why the “king” language surfaced

Coverage situates these moves amid policy fights and protest movements. The “king” post followed a high-profile DOT action on congestion pricing for Manhattan [2] [5]; the AI-video posts came during the nationwide “No Kings” demonstrations that explicitly opposed perceived authoritarianism in the Trump administration, and Trump’s posts were framed as mocking those protests [4] [8].

4. Public and political reactions: backlash, satire and polarization

Multiple outlets note swift bipartisan rebukes and satirical responses. New York Governor Kathy Hochul condemned the king rhetoric and said “New York hasn’t labored under a king in over 250 years,” while Democrats and some commentators called the self-reference inappropriate; media reported protesters and cultural figures joined the response [2] [3]. Conversely, some Republican allies used “king” imagery to mock protesters or rally supporters, showing competing political uses of the same motif [6] [9].

5. Misinformation and hoaxes: what to treat cautiously

Not all items in search results are equally reliable. A satire site (Brock Press) published a fabricated “official announcement” claiming Trump declared himself “King of America,” and that piece reads like a hoax; that item conflicts with mainstream reporting and should not be treated as factual [10]. By contrast, reporting in People, The Guardian, The Independent and Sky News documents verifiable social-media posts and AI videos [1] [2] [3] [4].

6. Legal and normative questions raised by the posts

Coverage links the rhetoric to broader debates about democratic norms: protesters framed “No Kings” as a defense of democratic institutions, while Trump’s posts were interpreted by critics as authoritarian theatricality; multiple outlets quote both protest organizers and administration defenders, indicating a deep disagreement about whether this is performance or a genuine threat to norms [11] [9] [2].

7. Limitations of available reporting and open questions

Available reporting documents specific posts and AI creations but does not provide an exhaustive catalogue of every instance Trump ever used “king” rhetoric; therefore, available sources do not mention a complete timeline beyond the cited examples [1] [4] [2]. Also, sources differ in tone and emphasis — some emphasize derision and threat (The Guardian, Mother Jones), others focus on the social-media stunt aspect (People, Sky News) — illustrating partisan and editorial divides [2] [9] [1].

8. Bottom line for readers

Factually: yes — Donald Trump has explicitly called himself “king” in social-media text and has posted and circulated AI imagery and videos depicting himself as a crowned monarch or “King Trump,” as documented by People, The Guardian, The Independent and other outlets [1] [2] [3] [6]. Interpretations vary: supporters sometimes treat it as humor or branding, critics see it as authoritarian symbolism; be wary of satire sites and confirm items against mainstream reportage before treating them as factual [10] [1].

Sources cited in this briefing include People, The Guardian, The Independent, Sky News, Variety and related outlets as noted above [1] [2] [3] [4] [7] [6] [10].

Want to dive deeper?
Has Donald Trump publicly used the word "king" to describe himself in speeches or tweets?
Which commentators and fact-checkers have debated whether Trump behaved like a monarch?
What examples of Trump invoking monarchical language exist in his public statements or campaign rhetoric?
How have U.S. constitutional experts and historians responded to claims that Trump sought unchecked presidential power?
Have any aides, books, or insiders reported Trump calling himself a king behind closed doors?