Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
Fact check: Did Donald Trump's golf habit affect his work schedule as president?
Executive Summary
Donald Trump’s post-2025 golf activity is documented across trackers and news reports that together claim he has spent a notable share of his presidency at his own properties and played golf on multiple occasions, prompting debates about time use, costs, and priorities. The available accounts disagree on scale and emphasis—some focus on the number of rounds and days at courses, others on the share of time spent at Trump-owned properties and the taxpayer costs—leaving the core fact clear but the interpretation contested [1] [2] [3].
1. How many golf days are we actually talking about—and why counts differ
Public trackers and news outlets record Trump’s golf outings with different methodologies, producing different tallies: one tracker reports 38 golf days (18.27% of his presidency) since January 20, 2025, while White House record summaries cited elsewhere list 13 golf days with concentrations at West Palm Beach and Doral [4] [5]. The discrepancy arises because trackers often count any day spent at a golf course or Trump property as a “golf day,” whereas official logs or White House communications sometimes list only confirmed rounds or dates with explicit golf activity. Methodological differences also hinge on whether travel days to properties count, whether private practice or informal play is included, and whether a visit to a property that includes non-golf presidential business is categorized as leisure. Those distinctions explain much of the numerical variance, but all sources indicate repeated and concentrated use of Trump-owned courses, creating the data point that matters for scrutiny even if exact counts vary [1] [2] [5].
2. Share of presidency spent at Trump properties—context and implications
Multiple reports converge on a broader claim that Trump has spent a substantial portion of his second-term presidency at properties he owns, with one prominent analysis concluding he spent almost a third of the presidency at his own properties, including golf courses and hotels, and that over half of those property-days involved golf [2]. That framing shifts the debate from isolated rounds to the geographic pattern of presidential activity—staying at private venues where lines between official duties, family, and business are blurred. Critics emphasize conflicts of interest and the cost to taxpayers for travel and security at private venues, while defenders argue that presidents historically have worked remotely and conducted official business from personal properties. The data therefore reframes “golf habit” as part of a larger pattern of location choices that matter for oversight, expense, and transparency [2] [6].
3. Cost to taxpayers and watchdog concerns—what’s been claimed
Investigations and watchdog groups have quantified fiscal effects, with one analysis estimating roughly $23 million in taxpayer costs tied to frequent golf-related travel and stays at private courses, framing those expenditures against reported federal cuts and job impacts to question priorities [3]. That figure aligns with broader ethics arguments that frequent travel to privately owned properties increases security, transport, and operational costs. Supporters of the president counter that travel and events produce local economic activity and that some expenses are routine for any president who travels. The fiscal number becomes a political signal more than a single verdict: it demonstrates financial consequences attached to the pattern, but interpretation depends on contested baselines—what costs are avoidable, how one credits local benefits, and which trips are deemed necessary for official duties [3] [7].
4. What trackers and records actually show—methodology matters
Dedicated trackers created since early 2025 compile visits, rounds, and courses visited, with one tracker beginning public updates in January 2025 and another continuing through mid-2025, noting concentrated play at West Palm Beach and Doral [1] [5]. These trackers emphasize transparency but also acknowledge limitations: some days lack confirmed sightings, and sites sometimes withhold updates absent visual confirmation to avoid errors [8] [1]. That operational caution produces conservative tallies but can undercount informal play or non-publicized rounds. Conversely, aggregated media counts may include broader travel days or property visits. The upshot is that raw numbers depend on reporting rules, and any conclusion about impact on work schedules must grapple with how many of those days involved genuine non-working leisure versus blended official and personal activity [8] [1].
5. Competing narratives and what’s still missing from the record
Coverage through mid-2025 paints two dominant narratives: one portraying frequent golf and property stays as evidence of reduced on-site White House engagement and misplaced priorities, and another framing those stays as normal presidential travel where official business continues [7] [6]. What the current record lacks is systematic minute-by-minute work diaries tied to every property visit, or an agreed standard for counting “workdays” versus “golf days.” Until such standardized disclosure—covering schedules, classified briefings attended remotely, and the content of meetings held at private venues—interpretation will remain disputed. Watchdogs and trackers provide useful flags and fiscal estimates [3] [2], but the debate hinges on both demonstrable patterns of time and unresolved questions about the substance of work conducted away from the White House [4] [5].