Did Federman say if you’re against Trump, you’re against the nation
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
Sen. John Fetterman publicly said “If you’re rooting against the president, you are rooting against the nation” while urging Democrats to temper alarm after Donald Trump’s 2024 win; multiple outlets quote that line from his ABC “This Week” appearance (see ABC7/ABC News reporting) [1]. Reporting across outlets shows Fetterman repeatedly urging Democrats not to “freak out” about Trump and stressing a pragmatic approach to working with the incoming administration [2] [3].
1. What Fetterman actually said and where it appeared
Fetterman told ABC’s “This Week” that he hopes Trump is successful in his second term and said, “If you’re rooting against the president, you are rooting against the nation,” a line quoted in ABC syndicated reporting collected by ABC7/ABC News [1]. That same interview and related coverage make clear he framed the comment as a call for stability and finding bipartisan wins rather than an embrace of Trump’s politics [1].
2. The broader message he has been promoting
This comment fits a pattern: since the 2024 election Fetterman has urged Democrats to “chill out” or stop “freaking out” about every Trump move, arguing that constant alarmism cost the party and that a calmer, more pragmatic strategy is needed to win working-class voters [2] [3]. NBC News reported his advice as part of a wider push to change Democratic messaging after 2024 losses [3].
3. How other outlets framed the remark
Coverage varies: USAToday and the Times of India reproduced his “not rooting against him” line and emphasized his argument that labeling Trump a “fascist” did not resonate with many voters [2] [4]. The Guardian and other outlets place Fetterman’s stance in the context of a broader shift in his posture toward Trump and his outreach to some Republican initiatives, noting tensions within the Democratic Party about his approach [5] [6].
4. Competing perspectives and intra-party reaction
Some Democrats and progressive activists view Fetterman’s rhetoric as a betrayallike pivot that downplays concerns about Trump’s rhetoric and policy agenda; reporting notes that fellow Democrats are “riled” and question his motives [5] [6]. Other commentators and Fetterman himself argue the tactical choice is aimed at rebuilding trust with voters who backed Trump and avoiding messages that alienate swing constituencies [3] [6].
5. What Fetterman did not say, according to available reporting
Available sources do not mention Fetterman explicitly endorsing every Trump policy, nor do they say he called Trump a model president; they record a nuanced stance of not wishing presidential failure and seeking areas of cooperation [1] [3]. Available sources do not mention him claiming that all opponents of Trump are unpatriotic beyond the quoted line; they present the phrase as a rhetorical appeal for unity rather than a legal or definitional pronouncement [1].
6. Why the line matters politically
The line—rooting against the president equals rooting against the nation—resonates because it reframes political opposition as potentially unpatriotic, a powerful rhetorical move that can pressure colleagues and voters to self-censor or prioritize stability. Outlets pick up on this because it signals a strategic recalibration within a Democratic senator who has national visibility and whose posture could influence party messaging [1] [3].
7. Limitations in current reporting and unanswered questions
Reporting cited here quotes the line and situates it in Fetterman’s broader messaging, but available sources do not provide the full transcript of the ABC interview, nor do they include follow-up clarifications from Fetterman explicitly defining “rooting against.” They also do not document private conversations he may have had with Democratic colleagues about framing strategy [1] [3].
8. Bottom line for readers
Fetterman did say the quoted sentence on national television and offered it as part of a plea for Democrats to pursue a less alarmist, more pragmatic strategy toward a Trump administration [1] [3]. That stance has split opinion: some see it as realistic outreach to swing voters [3], while others see it as an unnecessary rapprochement that downplays legitimate concerns about Trump [5] [6].