Did Melania trump waive her spousal privilege

1. What the claim says and where it appears

A short social-media post and a linked YouTube clip allege that “Melania gave up her spousal protection so she can go before the Grand Jury” in the Trump-related cases, an assertion that is circulating as a preview of “more coming” ^[3]; that post is the only item among the provided sources asserting an affirmative waiver, and it offers no supporting primary document, lawyer statement, court filing, or reporting to substantiate the claim ^[3].

2. What mainstream reporting and legal experts actually say

Contemporary reporting from Newsweek and an explainer in Times of India summarize legal commentary that treats spousal privilege as an available protection that makes Melania unlikely to be called or forced to testify, noting her lack of direct involvement in the underlying allegations and describing how the privilege protects confidential marital communications ^{[1] [2]}. Those articles quote former prosecutors and legal experts who explain that while a spouse can be subpoenaed, privilege can be asserted and its applicability will depend on the nature of communications and whether exceptions apply ^{[1] [2]}.

3. The legal landscape: subpoena, testimonial compulsion, and waiver — as described in reporting

The sources explain the difference between being listed as a potential witness and being compelled to testify: a judge can permit or a prosecutor can subpoena a witness, but spousal privilege protects confidential communications, and an asserted privilege is a procedural defense the witness may raise; reporting frames this as the likely reason Melania would not be called as a prosecution witness unless privilege were waived or an exception applied, not as proof she has waived it ^{[1] [2]}.

4. Missing evidence and the burden of proof for a waiver claim

None of the provided reporting shows a signed waiver, court filing, sworn declaration, or on-the-record statement from Melania’s counsel relinquishing spousal privilege; the social-media claim stands alone and uncorroborated, while Newsweek and Times of India present expert doubt that she will be compelled to testify and highlight privilege as protecting her — an absence of authoritative documentation means the affirmative claim of waiver is unsupported by the cited reporting ^{[3] [1] [2]}.

5. Alternative explanations, incentives, and how to evaluate subsequent claims

The lone social post and video appear designed to generate anticipation and a sensational narrative (“more coming”) without producing corroborating legal records ^[3]; alternative, more cautious explanations in mainstream coverage are that Melania could be listed as a potential witness for completeness or as part of trial strategy but that asserting spousal privilege makes compelled testimony unlikely absent waiver or an exception ^{[1] [2]}. Readers should look for primary-source evidence — a waiver document, transcript, or lawyer statement in court filings — before accepting claims of waiver, and note that social posts can serve political or promotional agendas when they leap to definitive legal conclusions ^[3].

Bottom line

Based on the provided sources, there is no documented evidence that Melania Trump has waived her spousal privilege; mainstream legal reporting treats the privilege as a plausible shield she could assert, while the lone social-media claim of waiver is uncorroborated by any cited court record or lawyer statement ^{[3] [1] [2]}.