Did republicans vote for releasing the epstein files?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
Yes — a substantial number of House Republicans voted to compel the Justice Department to release Jeffrey Epstein files: the House passed the bill 427–1 with nearly the entire Republican conference voting yes (only Rep. Clay Higgins opposed) [1][2][3]. Earlier in the fight, a small group of House Republicans (four members) joined Democrats to force a floor vote via a discharge petition, and reporting shows a mixed, sometimes contradictory picture in the Senate where Republican resistance and later acquiescence both appear in the record [4][5][6][7].
1. How the House voted — near-unanimous Republican support
The House vote was overwhelming: 427 members voted to require the DOJ to release Epstein-related records and only one member, Republican Clay Higgins, voted no, meaning most House Republicans supported the measure [1][2]; multiple outlets describe the outcome as a near-unanimous, bipartisan rebuke to earlier GOP leadership resistance [8][1].
2. Who pushed the vote — a handful of Republicans led the charge
The push to force a floor vote began with Rep. Thomas Massie (R‑Ky.), who filed a discharge petition and secured the signatures of three other House Republicans — Lauren Boebert, Nancy Mace and Marjorie Taylor Greene — joining Democrats to guarantee the measure would reach the floor [4][1][9]; Time and Newsweek catalogued those allies and explained the petition’s role in overcoming leadership reluctance [5][10].
3. Senate posture — mixed signals and competing narratives
Senate coverage is more ambiguous: some outlets report the Senate passed the bill with many Republican votes and sent it to the president, reflecting GOP relenting once it was clear the bill would pass [6][8], while a release from Senate Democrat Dick Durbin framed the outcome differently, saying “Senate Republicans voted against releasing the Epstein files,” highlighting a party split or procedural votes that differed from final passage narratives [7]. Reporting indicates Republicans ultimately did not uniformly block the measure in the Senate, but the record contains conflicting characterizations depending on the source and the stage of the effort [6][7].
4. Context, motives and intra‑party pressure
The political context matters: Republican leaders and President Trump at times opposed the effort and sought to block it, but faced pressure from victims’ advocates and a GOP conference that included both skeptics and backers of transparency; reporting notes that Trump reversed and said he would sign the bill once it became clear it had overwhelming support [11][6]. Several outlets also document internal Republican tension — leaders trying to block the measure while rank‑and‑file members and a few high-profile Republicans pushed it forward — suggesting a mix of genuine transparency claims and political calculations by different GOP actors [11][1].
5. After the vote — release, redactions and continued complaints
When the Justice Department released files, major outlets reported that the release was incomplete and heavily redacted, prompting public criticism from Rep. Massie and victims who said the release “grossly fails to comply with both the spirit and the letter of the law,” showing that Republican votes for the bill did not end the controversy over what would actually be produced [12][13]; media accounts observe that the partisan and public dispute shifted from whether files would be released to whether the DOJ complied with the law’s intent [12][11].