Did Trump refer to specific groups (e.g., veterans, political opponents, business partners) as "suckers" or "losers"?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
Reporting over several years has repeatedly alleged that Donald Trump called American service members and war dead "suckers" and "losers," an allegation first detailed in a multi-source Atlantic piece and amplified by former White House chief of staff John Kelly; Trump has denied the charge and fact-checkers note disputes and altered footage around related clips [1] [2] [3] [4]. The record is a mix of anonymous-sourced magazine reporting, public denials, corroboration by a high‑level ex‑staffer, and ongoing partisan debate — meaning the claim exists in journalistic record but remains contested in public discourse [1] [2] [4] [3].
1. The original allegation: a magazine report that named quotes and contexts
In September 2020 The Atlantic published a piece, based on multiple unnamed administration sources, asserting that Trump said of American war dead and Marines that "Why should I go to that cemetery? It's filled with losers," and in another exchange called Marines who died at Belleau Wood "suckers," a report that set off immediate political and media fallout [1] [3].
2. Corroboration from a senior aide: John Kelly’s public confirmation
John Kelly, who served as Trump's longest-serving chief of staff, publicly said in 2023 that Trump had indeed used the words "suckers" and "losers" to describe fallen U.S. service members and cited the France trip and related behavior as evidence, a confirmation media outlets such as Axios reported and used to bolster the Atlantic account [2].
3. Denials, rebuttals and political usage
Trump has repeatedly called the Atlantic story a "hoax" and denied making such comments, with aides and spokespeople also disputing the reporting at various moments; political campaigns and advocates on both sides have used the claim — Democrats to criticize Trump’s respect for veterans and Republicans to brand the reporting unreliable — turning the allegation into a political cudgel [1] [5] [6].
4. Fact‑checking, altered clips and the limits of public proof
Independent fact‑checks and news organizations have documented disputes around specific pieces of evidence: Reuters flagged an altered video circulating online that misrepresented a call in which Trump allegedly insulted soldiers, and Snopes and other outlets traced the claim back to The Atlantic’s anonymous sourcing while cataloging how the allegation resurfaced repeatedly in campaign cycles [4] [3]. Those fact‑checks show there are problems with some circulated video evidence and that the original Atlantic article relied on unnamed sources, which matters for assessing evidentiary weight [4] [3].
5. How institutions and veterans reacted — and why that matters
Congressional veterans and advocacy groups condemned the reported remarks when they resurfaced, treating Kelly’s confirmation and The Atlantic’s account as serious enough to prompt public rebukes from lawmakers and veterans organizations who said the comments were unacceptable if true, a reaction covered by outlets including Congressional News and Military.com [7] [8]. That institutional response amplified the political stakes even as journalistic sources wrestled with sourcing and denials.
6. Bottom line: what can be stated with confidence and what remains contested
It is a documented fact in multiple reputable news accounts that The Atlantic reported Trump used the words "suckers" and "losers" about U.S. war dead and that former chief of staff John Kelly later affirmed that characterization [1] [2]. It is also a documented fact that Trump and his allies denied the report, that some video evidence tied to the allegation has been altered or disputed, and that fact‑checkers caution about the limitations of anonymous sourcing and viral clips — therefore the claim exists in the public record but remains contested and not settled to universal journalistic consensus [1] [4] [3].