Did trump’s felony charges get dropped?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
The narrow, direct answer is: yes — several criminal prosecutions against Donald Trump that were active through 2024–2025 were formally dropped or halted after he won re-election and returned to the presidency, including federal indictments that Special Counsel Jack Smith moved to dismiss and the remaining Georgia state charges that were dropped by the Georgia prosecutor [1] [2]. Those dismissals coexist with other unresolved or overturned rulings — most notably a prior New York felony conviction that has been the subject of appeals and additional legal maneuvering [3] [4].
1. What was dropped: federal cases and the Georgia indictment
After Trump won a second term, Special Counsel Jack Smith moved to dismiss federal criminal charges tied to the classified-documents probe and to allegations of trying to overturn the 2020 election, on the premise that longstanding Department of Justice policy bars the indictment and prosecution of a sitting president; observers and reporting say Smith took that step in November following the election [1] [4]. Separately, Georgia’s prosecutor moved to dismiss the remaining state charges in the election-interference case — a step described as ending “the final criminal case against President Trump” by PBS [2]. Ballotpedia’s timeline also records the November dismissal of remaining Georgia counts [3].
2. Why prosecutors acted: immunity, policy and politics
The proximate legal rationale for the federal dismissals rests on DOJ policy and Office of Legal Counsel precedent that limit criminal prosecution of a sitting president, a line of reasoning cited in coverage summarizing Smith’s motion to drop charges after Trump’s inauguration [1] [4]. The Georgia dismissal came from the state prosecutor’s decision to move to dismiss remaining counts; PBS framed that move as concluding a chapter in the multi-jurisdictional legal battles surrounding Trump [2]. Reporting highlights the institutional constraints (OLC/doctrine) and the political reality of presidential immunity as central factors in the timing and substance of those decisions [1].
3. What was not erased: convictions, appeals and remaining legal exposure
Those dismissals did not magically vacate every legal judgment Trump faced. Reporting shows that Trump had been convicted in New York in 2024 on 34 counts of falsifying business records, a conviction that entered sentencing and subsequent appeals processes in 2025; that conviction’s fate has been the subject of further motions to vacate or dismiss by his lawyers [3] [4]. Coverage also notes ongoing civil judgments and other legal entanglements that were not simply undone by the November dismissals [4].
4. The clemency layer and practical effects
Beyond dismissals, the presidential power of clemency reshaped certain outcomes in 2025: the Justice Department’s Pardon Office lists clemency grants under President Trump’s administration, and reporting indicates presidential pardons and clemency actions erased or reduced penalties and restitution in some cases, complicating the practical impact of prosecutions and judgments [5] [6]. Those actions are distinct from a prosecutor withdrawing charges, but together they altered the real-world consequences for some defendants and judgments tied to the wider set of cases.
5. Interpretations, motives and the larger context
Different outlets frame these moves in contrasting ways: institutions stressing rule-of-law constraints and DOJ doctrine (International Bar Association; Time) present the dismissals as legally compelled or pragmatic [1] [4], while other sources and critics emphasize political effect and the reality that a president seldom faces trial while in office, implicitly noting the advantage incumbency confers [2] [3]. State-level decisions — like the Georgia dismissal — also carry local prosecutorial discretion and possible political considerations; reporting does not provide a single uncontested motive and shows legal doctrine and political calculation both at play [2] [3].
6. Bottom line
Multiple criminal proceedings that had targeted Trump were indeed dropped or halted after he was sworn in as president in his second term, including federal indictments and the remaining Georgia counts; nevertheless, other convictions and appeals remained active or contested, and presidential clemency further altered some outcomes — so “dropped” is accurate for those specific prosecutions but does not erase the broader, still-complex legal record chronicled across the sources [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6].