Did trump fire air traffic controllers?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
President Trump’s administration did initiate mass terminations at the Federal Aviation Administration affecting “several hundred” employees — reports and officials put the number at “fewer than 400” or “nearly 400,” and the firings targeted probationary FAA staff, not a wholesale purge of certified controllers [1] [2] [3]. Multiple fact-checkers and news outlets say there is no evidence Trump fired 3,000 air traffic controllers; instead reporting shows targeted layoffs of FAA employees including some who supported air-traffic functions, while the FAA and Transportation officials insisted critical safety personnel were retained [4] [2] [5].
1. What happened: a targeted purge, not a mass decertification
Over a busy travel weekend in mid-February the Trump administration began firing “several hundred” FAA employees via late-night emails to probationary workers, a move described by unions and multiple outlets as affecting under 400 people out of the FAA’s roughly 45,000-person workforce [1] [6] [2]. Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy and other officials stressed the cuts hit probationary hires and asserted “zero air traffic controllers and critical safety personnel were let go,” while unions and some lawmakers contested that support staff and maintenance personnel tied to navigation and radar functions were impacted [2] [5] [7].
2. The viral claim: where “3,000 controllers fired” came from — and why it’s incorrect
A widely shared social post claimed Trump fired 3,000 air traffic controllers; multiple fact-checkers found no evidence to support that specific figure. Snopes concluded there is no evidence Trump specifically fired 3,000 controllers, and other fact-checkers and outlets debunked or questioned the origin of the number as unsubstantiated viral misinformation [4] [8]. Official and mainstream reports uniformly describe the number of FAA employees fired as in the low hundreds, not thousands [2] [9].
3. Which FAA roles were affected — controllers, maintenance, or probationary hires?
Reporting indicates the firings primarily targeted probationary employees — workers hired less than a year earlier — and included a mix of positions such as radar, landing, and navigational-aid maintenance staff; at least one account said some of those fired had worked on classified early-warning radar projects [5] [6]. The Department’s initial statements claimed it “retained employees who perform critical safety functions,” but some union leaders and members said the terminations hit staff who provide essential operational support [7] [6].
4. Political context and competing narratives
Democratic lawmakers and union leaders framed the moves as reckless and dangerous for aviation safety, with Sen. Jeanne Shaheen and House Democrats explicitly criticizing the firings and a hiring freeze for air traffic controllers [3] [10]. The administration framed the cuts as part of a cost-cutting, efficiency push and said it continued hiring and onboarding air traffic controllers and safety professionals [9] [2]. Both narratives are present in the record: critics warn of degraded capacity and supporters insist that critical safety roles were preserved [3] [2] [9].
5. Safety implications and the timing around the DC collision
The firings occurred weeks after a fatal midair collision near Reagan National Airport that raised scrutiny of air-traffic staffing; some reporting noted concerns about staffing levels at the facility involved, though the National Transportation Safety Board’s investigation was ongoing and causal links remain unproven in the sources [1] [5]. The AP and others reported earlier staff and leadership departures at FAA components and the dissolution of advisory committees, which critics say compounded safety worries — those organizational changes are documented in the reporting [1] [6].
6. What remains unclear or not covered in current reporting
Available sources do not mention definitive, sourced evidence that the firings directly caused any specific safety failure or were the proximate cause of the Washington collision; investigators were still working and the NTSB had not issued a final causal determination in the cited reporting [1] [4]. Sources also do not establish a clear accounting of which exact job series (by pay or certification) were permanently vacated versus later backfilled, beyond the general descriptions of probationary and maintenance roles being affected [5] [2].
7. Bottom line for readers
Multiple reputable outlets and fact-checkers agree Trump’s administration fired several hundred FAA employees — not 3,000 certified air traffic controllers — but the firings targeted roles that some experts and lawmakers say support aviation safety, prompting sharp partisan disagreement over whether the moves were prudent cost-cutting or a dangerous hollowing-out of capacity [1] [4] [3] [2]. Follow-up reporting and official NTSB findings are necessary to establish any causal links between staffing changes and specific safety incidents; those final determinations are not yet reported in the available sources [1] [4].